
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 講師、シンメトリー・ジャパン代表木田の挨拶と自己紹介
00:09 - 評価とその伝達方法に悩む上司へ、ノウハウを学ぶことが講座の目的と説明
00:27 - 最初の演習に取り組むよう促す
Time Stamp
00:00 - Lecturer Mr. Kida from Symmetry Japn gives greeting and self-introduction
00:09 - Explains that struggling with evaluating and communicating results to subordinates is common, and that learning the know-how is the course's purpose
00:27 - Prompts the viewer to work on the first exercise
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 演習の説明:30分後に始まる評価面談にどう臨むか
00:24 - 考えるべき3つの観点(順番・スタンス・目的)を提示
00:50 - ヒント1の回答:場作り→自己評価確認→ギャップ埋め→評価結果伝達→改善計画討議の流れ
01:33 - ヒント2の回答:対話重視、説得や言い訳をしない姿勢
02:08 - ヒント3の回答:部下育成と事業推進という2つの目的
Time Stamp
00:00 - Introduces the exercise: how to approach an evaluation meeting starting in 30 minutes
00:24 - Presents three points to consider: order of topics, stance, and purpose
00:50 - Answer to hint 1: the flow of rapport-building, checking self-evaluation, closing the gap, communicating the result, and discussing an improvement plan
01:33 - Answer to hint 2: a stance of dialogue rather than persuasion or making excuses
02:08 - Answer to hint 3: the two purposes of developing the subordinate and advancing the business
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 会話例の紹介開始(音読形式)
00:11 - 上司が本題に入り、部下自身の自己評価を尋ねる
00:41 - 部下がA評価を自己申告、上司が「ああ、ええか」と期待値を調整
01:44 - 上司がプロセス(オフィス研修の進め方)の課題を指摘
02:18 - 部下が反論、上司が二軸思考で他部署の視点を提示
03:00 - 対人折衝力という主任クラスへの期待を説明
04:18 - C評価を伝達、部下の抵抗に対し黙って待つ
Time Stamp
00:00 - Begins introducing the sample conversation (read aloud)
00:11 - The manager opens the main topic and asks the subordinate for their own self-evaluation
00:41 - The subordinate self-reports an A rating; the manager responds noncommittally to adjust expectations
01:44 - The manager points out a process issue (how the in-person training was planned)
02:18 - The subordinate pushes back; the manager uses two-axis thinking to offer another department's perspective
03:00 - Explains the interpersonal negotiation skill expected at the assistant-manager level
04:18 - Communicates the C rating and waits silently through the subordinate's resistance
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 悪い会話例の紹介
00:15 - 期待値を作らずいきなりC評価を告げる失敗
00:42 - 「なぜ」という質問で部下を問い詰めてしまう失敗
01:01 - 対人折衝力の欠如を直接的に指摘し部下が納得できない失敗
01:37 - 部下の成果を自分の手柄のように扱い不信感を招く失敗
02:00 - 許可を取らずいきなり来期の話を始め、指導を丸投げする失敗
02:34 - 解説:「なぜ」はNG、理由を聞くなら「何がきっかけで」と言い換える
Time Stamp
00:00 - Introduces a bad example conversation
00:15 - Mistake: announcing the C rating abruptly without building any expectation first
00:42 - Mistake: interrogating the subordinate with "why" questions
01:01 - Mistake: bluntly pointing out a lack of interpersonal skill, leaving the subordinate unconvinced
01:37 - Mistake: taking credit for the subordinate's achievement, causing distrust
02:00 - Mistake: jumping to next term's topic without permission and dumping the task back on the subordinate
02:34 - Commentary: avoid "why"; rephrase as "what prompted you to..." when you need a reason
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 王道パターンを確立する重要性と守破離の考え方
00:38 - 対人折衝力の指導は期末ではなく期初・期中に行うべきという補足
01:22 - 期中の1on1などで継続的に指導する重要性
01:56 - まとめ:部下の自己評価を先に聞くことの効果
02:19 - 王道パターン習得後は個別対応(守破離)へ進むことを推奨
Time Stamp
00:00 - The importance of establishing a standard pattern, and the shu-ha-ri concept
00:38 - Note: coaching on interpersonal skill should happen at the start or mid-term, not at term-end
01:22 - The importance of ongoing coaching through mid-term 1-on-1s
01:56 - Summary: the benefit of asking for the subordinate's self-evaluation first
02:19 - Recommends moving to individualized responses (shu-ha-ri) after mastering the standard pattern
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 講座の狙い:目標立案・評価・評価伝達の体系的理解
00:16 - MBO(目標による管理制度)の活用を目指すと説明
00:38 - 講座の進め方:演習、Q&Aタブ、PDFダウンロード資料の案内
01:38 - 講師・木田知廣氏の経歴紹介
02:33 - Udemy上の関連講座群(戦略思考エンジン)の紹介
03:03 - 自身の部下評価における悩みの経験談
03:44 - 結論:納得感が評価面談の鍵
Time Stamp
00:00 - Course aim: systematically understanding goal-setting, evaluation, and communicating evaluation results
00:16 - Explains the goal of learning to use MBO (Management by Objectives)
00:38 - How the course works: exercises, the Q&A tab, and downloadable PDF resources
01:38 - Introduces the instructor Tomohiro Kida's background
02:33 - Introduces his related course lineup on Udemy (the "Strategic Thinking Engine")
03:03 - Shares his own struggles evaluating subordinates as a business owner
03:44 - Conclusion: a sense of conviction (nattokukan) is the key to evaluation meetings
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 評価の透明性が求められる時代背景
00:23 - 人的資本経営と若手社員の成長志向の高まり
01:09 - 上司側にとっての評価力向上のメリット
01:23 - MBO(目標による管理制度)の説明とM&AにおけるMBOとの違い
02:14 - MBOの発案者(ドラッカー)と自己管理の思想
02:59 - 絶対評価と相対評価の違いと日本企業での運用実態
04:57 - 自社の用語・制度に合わせて内容を読み替える必要性
05:49 - 人事制度が形骸化している場合の対応と上層部への働きかけ
Time Stamp
00:00 - Background: why transparency in evaluation is increasingly demanded
00:23 - Human capital management and the rising growth-orientation of younger employees
01:09 - Benefits for managers themselves in improving their evaluation skills
01:23 - Explains MBO (Management by Objectives) and how it differs from MBO in the M&A sense
02:14 - MBO's originator (Peter Drucker) and the idea of employee self-management
02:59 - The difference between absolute and relative evaluation, and how Japanese companies actually apply them
04:57 - The need to translate the course's terms to match one's own company's system
05:49 - How to respond when the HR system has become a formality, and advocating for change with senior management
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 場作り(スモールトーク)から始める理由:対話の必要性
00:44 - 緊張しがちな面談を乗り越えるためのスモールトーク
01:15 - おすすめ行動1:本題と関係ないことで笑顔を見せる
01:53 - おすすめ行動2:相手から発言を引き出す質問例
02:18 - おすすめ行動3:90度の位置に座る(悪い例と良い例の図解)
03:36 - テクニックであっても部下に安心感を与えるのが上司の仕事という考え方
Time Stamp
00:00 - Why to start with rapport-building (small talk): the need for genuine dialogue
00:44 - Using small talk to get past the tension evaluation meetings tend to create
01:15 - Recommended action 1: smile about something unrelated to the main topic
01:53 - Recommended action 2: example questions that draw the subordinate into talking
02:18 - Recommended action 3: sitting at a 90-degree angle (diagrams of bad and good examples)
03:36 - The view that giving subordinates a sense of safety, even via technique, is part of a manager's job
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 部下の自己評価と根拠を先に確認する理由
00:29 - 後出しじゃんけん:先に自己評価を聞くメリット
01:06 - ギャップ埋めは事実と評価基準に基づいて行う(心情面は考慮しない)
01:55 - 部下の内面的な能力を否定する話し方は避けるべき理由
02:33 - 図解:会社の基準に照らして事実を判定する話法
Time Stamp
00:00 - Why to check the subordinate's self-evaluation and its reasoning first
00:29 - The "answering last" advantage of hearing the self-evaluation before revealing your own
01:06 - Closing the gap should rest on facts and evaluation criteria, not on emotional appeals
01:55 - Why to avoid framing feedback around the subordinate's inner traits or abilities
02:33 - Diagram: a way of talking that judges facts against the company's own standard
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 参加型リーダーシップの5つのツールの紹介
00:29 - 承認:語尾を繰り返す相槌法
01:41 - 承認:ミラーリングとうなずき方
02:18 - 承認:本物の笑顔を作る「マインドフォトグラフ法」
03:35 - 発散:部下の発想を広げる「二軸思考」
Time Stamp
00:00 - Introduces the five tools of participative leadership
00:29 - Acknowledgment: the technique of echoing the end of what the subordinate said
01:41 - Acknowledgment: mirroring gestures and matching nodding
02:18 - Acknowledgment: the "mind photograph" method for a genuine smile
03:35 - Divergence: "two-axis thinking" to broaden the subordinate's perspective
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - ワンクッション話法(「もしよかったら」など)
00:08 - アイコミュニケーション:主語を「私」にする
01:03 - グッド&バッドの順番、サンドイッチ話法は非推奨
02:03 - 整理:雑多な話をまとめてあげる
02:23 - 許可取り:意見を言う前に許可を得る
03:00 - 確認:曖昧な発言を具体的な行動(期限付き)に落とし込む
04:02 - まとめ:5つの中でも「承認」が最重要
Time Stamp
00:00 - The "one-cushion" phrasing technique (e.g. "if you don't mind...")
00:08 - "I"-communication: making yourself, not the other person, the subject of the sentence
01:03 - The good-then-bad order, and why the "praise sandwich" is not recommended
02:03 - Organizing: helping tidy up a scattered conversation
02:23 - Asking permission before offering your own opinion
03:00 - Confirming: turning a vague statement into a concrete, time-bound action
04:02 - Summary: of the five tools, acknowledgment matters most
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 評価結果伝達のステップに戻り、結果を端的に伝える重要性
00:44 - 評価と報酬(ボーナス等)の関係を問われた際の準備
01:17 - 改善計画の討議は次のパートで詳説すると予告
01:34 - まとめ:透明性の高い評価が求められる時代
01:50 - まとめ:参加型リーダーシップの5つのツールと承認相槌の重要性
02:26 - まとめ:事実と評価基準をベースに話すことの重要性
Time Stamp
00:00 - Returning to the result-communication step and why it should be delivered plainly
00:44 - Preparing for questions about how the rating relates to compensation (e.g. bonus)
01:17 - Notes that the improvement-plan discussion will be covered in detail in the next part
01:34 - Summary: an era that demands more transparent evaluation
01:50 - Summary: the five participative leadership tools and the importance of the acknowledgment technique
02:26 - Summary: the importance of grounding the conversation in facts and evaluation criteria
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 評価の罠と回避策の紹介(参考情報)
00:16 - ハロー効果と「部下入れ替えチェック」による回避法
00:49 - 中心化傾向(B評価への集中)とその原因
01:14 - 寛大化・厳格化傾向と他部署課長との目線合わせ
01:49 - 対比誤差(自分基準との比較)と「仮想社員」設定による回避法
02:28 - 直近効果と「部下一行日記」による回避法
02:59 - 属人的要因と外的要因の取り違いと横並び比較
03:33 - 好き嫌い・相性の影響と「イタコ評価」による回避法
Time Stamp
00:00 - Introduces evaluation biases and how to avoid them (reference material)
00:16 - The halo effect, and the "swap the subordinate" check to counter it
00:49 - Central tendency (clustering ratings around B) and its cause
01:14 - Leniency/severity bias, and calibrating with a peer manager in another department
01:49 - Contrast error (comparing to yourself) and the "imaginary employee" technique to avoid it
02:28 - Recency bias, and using the "one-line subordinate diary" to avoid it
02:59 - Confusing personal versus external factors, and comparing peers side by side
03:33 - The effect of personal liking or compatibility, and the "channeling" (itako) technique to avoid it
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 会話例の紹介(部下:小林さん)
00:22 - 部下の自己評価(B〜A評価の見込み)を確認
00:52 - 上司がB評価に届かないと伝え、部下が納得したふりで逃げる
01:39 - 逃げを見逃さず、マニュアルだけで解決できるか問い直す
02:32 - 二軸思考でサポート部署という枠を超えた視点を促す
03:38 - C評価を伝達、部下の「ですか」質問への対応
04:17 - ワンクッション話法で来期の課題への取り組みを依頼
Time Stamp
00:00 - Introduces the sample conversation (subordinate: Kobayashi)
00:22 - Checks the subordinate's self-evaluation (expecting a B to A rating)
00:52 - The manager says the work falls short of a B, and the subordinate feigns understanding to avoid the issue
01:39 - The manager doesn't let the deflection pass, and asks whether a manual alone really solves the problem
02:32 - Uses two-axis thinking to push the subordinate beyond the "we're just a support team" framing
03:38 - Communicates the C rating and how to handle the subordinate's passive "what should I do?" question
04:17 - Uses the one-cushion phrasing to request the subordinate take on next term's challenge
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - AIロールプレイ機能の説明と進め方
00:53 - 講師推奨の会話例は後日確認するよう案内
01:05 - 設定:営業サポート課・小林さんとの評価結果伝達面談
01:59 - 小林さんの今期の目標達成状況(入力業務は良好、効率化は物足りず)
02:40 - 小林さんの「コンフォートゾーン」(サポート役に徹する姿勢)の説明
03:34 - 5ステップとギャップ埋めツールを活用した対話を促す
Time Stamp
00:00 - Explains the AI role-play feature and how it works
00:53 - Notes that the instructor's recommended dialogue will be available to check afterward
01:05 - Setup: an evaluation meeting with Kobayashi of the Sales Support section
01:59 - Kobayashi's performance this term (excellent on data entry, underwhelming on efficiency improvement)
02:40 - Explains Kobayashi's "comfort zone" — sticking strictly to a support role
03:34 - Encourages using the 5-step framework and the gap-closing tools in the role-play
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 評価対象は「成果」と「プロセス」に大別されると説明
00:16 - 成果評価:難易度×達成度による算出方法
00:49 - プロセス評価:頻度・徹底度による評価と、本講座での位置づけ(行動目標として統合)
01:47 - 調整項目・加点項目(突発対応や裏方貢献への加点)の紹介
Time Stamp
00:00 - Explains that what gets evaluated splits broadly into "results" and "process"
00:16 - Results evaluation: calculated as difficulty multiplied by degree of achievement
00:49 - Process evaluation: judged by frequency and thoroughness, and how this course folds it into behavioral goals
01:47 - Introduces adjustment and bonus-point items (crediting emergency response or behind-the-scenes contribution)
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 「部下一行日記」の紹介:1日1行で観察力を高める
00:29 - 気軽に取り組める書き方(全部下を毎日書く必要はない)
00:47 - 継続することで観察力・指導力が向上する効果
01:23 - 書き方の例(高橋さんのケース)
02:22 - 60秒ルール:その場でのフィードバックが基本、日記は念のための補助
03:20 - ポジティブな記述の重要性とピグマリオン効果
05:16 - まとめ:一行日記のメリットと書き方のポイント
Time Stamp
00:00 - Introduces the "one-line subordinate diary": sharpening observation with just one line a day
00:29 - A low-effort way to keep it up (no need to write about every subordinate every day)
00:47 - The effect of improved observation and coaching skill from keeping it up
01:23 - An example entry (the Takahashi case)
02:22 - The 60-second rule: real-time feedback is the basic practice; the diary is just a backup
03:20 - The importance of writing positive entries, and the Pygmalion effect
05:16 - Summary: the benefits of the one-line diary and how to write it
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 部下育成の全体像(サイクル)の紹介
00:19 - 目標設定・仕事の選定・仕事を通じた能力開発
00:39 - 体制構築(組織ぐるみでの育成)とインプット(説明・ティーチング)
01:17 - 進捗確認(コーチング)と振り返り・フィードバック
01:43 - サイクルを繰り返すことで部下が成長するという結び
Time Stamp
00:00 - Introduces the overall cycle for developing subordinates
00:19 - Setting goals, choosing assignments, and developing ability through the work itself
00:39 - Building a support structure (organization-wide development) and input (explaining/teaching)
01:17 - Checking progress (coaching) and reflection/feedback
01:43 - Closing point: repeating the cycle is what drives the subordinate's growth
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - テーマ転換:期首の目標設定の重要性の説明
00:54 - 演習:高橋さんの目標(抜粋)のダメな点を指摘する課題
01:56 - SMARTフレームワークの5要素を解説
03:04 - 回答例:高橋さんの目標をSMARTで評価(Specific・Measurable・Relevantが不合格)
Time Stamp
00:00 - Shifts topic: the importance of goal-setting at the start of the term
00:54 - Exercise: point out what's wrong with Takahashi's (excerpted) goal
01:56 - Explains the five elements of the SMART framework
03:04 - Sample answer: scoring Takahashi's goal against SMART (fails on Specific, Measurable, and Relevant)
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 改善案:目標を3つに分割して再設定
00:29 - 数値目標(参加率80%、満足度4点)と行動目標(週1回の対面コミュニケーション)の設定
01:23 - 改善のポイント:2段階化・数値化・行動目標化のまとめ
Time Stamp
00:00 - Improvement: splitting the goal into three separate parts
00:29 - Setting numeric goals (80% participation, satisfaction score of 4) and a behavioral goal (in-person contact once a week)
01:23 - Summary of the improvement: splitting into stages, quantifying, and adding a behavioral goal
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 具体性(Specific)と目的整合性(Relevant)を同時に検討する考え方
00:57 - 図解:会社戦略がKGI/KPIを経て個人目標に連結する構造
02:14 - 等級による具体性と目的整合性のバランスの違い
02:58 - Measurable:数値化のメリットとリスク、判別可能な状態目標の作り方(悪い例と良い例)
Time Stamp
00:00 - The idea of weighing Specific and Relevant together
00:57 - Diagram: how company strategy flows through KGIs/KPIs down to individual goals
02:14 - How the balance between specificity and goal alignment shifts by job grade
02:58 - Measurable: the benefits and risks of quantifying, and how to write a clearly judgable state-based goal (bad vs. good examples)
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - Attainable:目標の難易度は等級で決めるべき理由(悪い例)
00:50 - 個人の能力差で難易度を変えると生じる評価の矛盾
01:15 - 標準目標と段階目標の二段階化によるやる気の維持
02:41 - Timebound:期間目標と期日目標の違い(高橋さんの例)
03:41 - まとめ:難易度・成果・タイミング・目的別の目標の整理
Time Stamp
00:00 - Attainable: why goal difficulty should be set by job grade, not by the individual (a bad example)
00:50 - The contradiction that arises when difficulty is adjusted for individual ability
01:15 - Using a two-tier structure of a standard goal plus a stepping-stone goal to sustain motivation
02:41 - Timebound: the difference between a period-based goal and a deadline-based goal (the Takahashi example)
03:41 - Summary: organizing goals by difficulty, outcome, timing, and purpose
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 演習:小林さんの目標(抜粋)をSMARTフレームワークでダメ出し
00:51 - SMART各項目での評価結果(Specific△、Measurable×、Attainable△、Relevant○、Timebound△)
02:34 - 回答例:改善した目標を4点に分けて再構成
Time Stamp
00:00 - Exercise: critique Kobayashi's (excerpted) goal using the SMART framework
00:51 - SMART scoring results (Specific: fair, Measurable: fail, Attainable: fair, Relevant: pass, Timebound: fair)
02:34 - Sample answer: restructuring the improved goal into four points
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - センスメイキング(意味づけ)の導入と目標伝達の重要性
00:46 - 目標伝達面談までの時間軸(2週間前の指示〜当日の面談)
01:31 - 部下自身に目標を立案してもらう意義(自主性の尊重)
02:13 - 部下だけでは目標の質を高めにくい理由(技術・戦略理解の不足)
03:47 - 上司が改善した目標を提示する際に生じるギャップとセンスメイキングの必要性
Time Stamp
00:00 - Introduces sensemaking and why how a goal is communicated matters
00:46 - The timeline leading up to the goal-setting meeting (from instructions two weeks out to the meeting itself)
01:31 - Why it matters to have the subordinate draft their own goal first (respecting autonomy)
02:13 - Why a subordinate alone struggles to raise the goal's quality (lacking technique and strategic context)
03:47 - The gap that opens when the manager presents an improved version, and why sensemaking is needed to close it
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 演習:高橋さんに改善版の目標を納得してもらう対話を考える課題
00:57 - センスメイキング4ステップの紹介
01:19 - ステップ1:状況・課題の説明(部下のレベルに応じた粒度調整)
02:03 - ステップ2・3:組織にとっての意味づけと本人にとっての意味づけ
02:52 - ステップ4:動機づけと自己効力感
Time Stamp
00:00 - Exercise: design a conversation to get Takahashi on board with the improved goal
00:57 - Introduces the four steps of sensemaking
01:19 - Step 1: explaining the situation and challenge, adjusted in detail to the subordinate's level
02:03 - Steps 2 and 3: framing the meaning for the organization, then for the individual
02:52 - Step 4: motivation and building self-efficacy
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 会話例:改善した目標を高橋さんに提示
00:44 - 状況説明:DXとIT化の違い、売上横ばいという課題
01:57 - 部下本人にとっての意味づけ(臆せず聞ける人材だからこその依頼)
02:44 - こだわらない点(参加率の数値)とこだわる点(満足度)の使い分け
03:15 - チャレンジ目標の設定と動機づけ、まとめ
Time Stamp
00:00 - Sample dialogue: presenting the improved goal to Takahashi
00:44 - Explaining the situation: the difference between DX and IT-ization, and the challenge of flat sales
01:57 - Meaning for the individual: the request is made precisely because Takahashi can ask questions fearlessly
02:44 - Distinguishing what to be flexible on (the participation number) from what not to compromise on (satisfaction)
03:15 - Setting a stretch goal, motivating, and wrapping up
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - AIロールプレイの導入:小林さんとのセンスメイキング対話練習
00:19 - センスメイキングの4ステップ(状況説明→組織への意味づけ→本人への意味づけ→動機づけ)を意識した対話を促す
Time Stamp
00:00 - Introduces the AI role-play: practicing a sensemaking conversation with Kobayashi
00:19 - Encourages practicing dialogue that follows the four sensemaking steps: situation, meaning for the organization, meaning for the individual, and motivation
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 会話例:改善した目標(営業同行)への部下の抵抗
00:55 - 状況説明:売上頭打ちと人手不足という課題
01:24 - 心情的な反論には付き合わず、AIによる視点転換を提示
02:20 - 手段(営業同行)への固執を手放し、目的(属人化解消)に絞る
02:52 - 動機づけと「誘導」による成長支援、まとめ
Time Stamp
00:00 - Sample dialogue: the subordinate's resistance to the improved goal (accompanying sales visits)
00:55 - Explaining the situation: flat sales and a labor shortage
01:24 - Not engaging with an emotional objection, and reframing the issue around AI
02:20 - Letting go of attachment to the means (accompanying sales) and focusing on the actual goal (eliminating over-reliance on individuals)
02:52 - Motivation and a bit of gentle "steering" to support growth, and a wrap-up
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - このパートのまとめ:目標設定から伝達までの流れ
00:39 - MBOに対する3つの問題意識(期間の長さ、チャレンジ不足、管理されている感)
02:06 - 対応策としての1on1(高頻度面談)
02:22 - OKR(目標と主要な結果)の紹介:達成率50〜70%が理想という考え方
03:05 - No Rating(評価廃止)という動きの紹介
03:50 - 今後の展望:AIによる目標設定・評価サポートの普及
Time Stamp
00:00 - Summary of this part: the flow from setting a goal to communicating it
00:39 - Three concerns raised about MBO: the cycle being too long, a lack of challenging goals, and a feeling of being controlled
02:06 - 1-on-1 meetings (higher-frequency check-ins) as a response
02:22 - Introduces OKRs (Objectives and Key Results): the idea that 50-70% achievement is actually ideal
03:05 - Introduces the "No Rating" movement of abolishing ratings altogether
03:50 - Looking ahead: the coming normalization of AI-assisted goal-setting and evaluation
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - 講座全体の振り返り(評価結果伝達→日々の指導→目標設定→センスメイキング)
01:17 - ネクストステップ:まず部下一行日記から始める提案
01:51 - 結びの言葉:Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish
Time Stamp
00:00 - Reviewing the whole course: evaluation communication, daily coaching, goal-setting, and sensemaking
01:17 - Next step: a suggestion to start with the one-line subordinate diary first
01:51 - Closing words: Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - Q:評価は成果とプロセスどちらを重視すべきか
00:16 - A:社内ルールがなければ自分でポリシーを定め部下と事前合意
00:30 - A:等級が低いほどプロセス重視、上がるほど成果重視という目安
Time Stamp
00:00 - Q: In evaluation, should results or process be weighted more?
00:16 - A: Without a company rule, set your own policy and agree on it with the subordinate in advance
00:30 - A: A rule of thumb — weight process more at lower grades, and results more at higher grades
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - Q:裏方的な貢献はどこまで評価に含めるべきか
00:08 - A:上司と部下で認識がずれやすいため要注意
00:40 - A:目標設定段階で行動目標として明記させるのが得策
Time Stamp
00:00 - Q: How much should behind-the-scenes contribution count toward the evaluation?
00:08 - A: Manager and subordinate perceptions often diverge here, so caution is needed
00:40 - A: The better approach is to have it written into the goal explicitly at the goal-setting stage
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - Q:前年より成長しているが成果未達の部下をどう評価するか
00:16 - A:プロセス評価は加点、進捗の法則に基づき承認を強める
00:43 - A:ただし成果評価は厳正に低いままとする
Time Stamp
00:00 - Q: How to evaluate a subordinate who has grown since last year but still missed the results target
00:16 - A: Give credit in process evaluation, and lean into acknowledgment based on the "progress principle"
00:43 - A: But the results evaluation should still be judged strictly and stay low
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - Q:評価が低い、または未達が続く部下の次期フォロー方法
00:16 - A:心理面ではなく行動面にフォーカスする「行動アプローチ」を推奨
00:34 - A:心理面へのアプローチは個人攻撃の罠やパワハラのリスクがある
01:01 - A:具体的な行動を示し、達成度に応じてハードルを調整
Time Stamp
00:00 - Q: How to follow up next term with a subordinate who rates low or keeps missing targets
00:16 - A: Recommends a "behavioral approach" that focuses on actions, not psychology
00:34 - A: A psychology-focused approach risks the "attack the person" trap and harassment
01:01 - A: Spell out concrete actions and adjust the bar up or down based on how they're doing
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - Q:部門間で目標の難易度に差がある場合の公平性の担保
00:19 - A:本来は上級役職者間の目合わせ会議で難易度基準を統一すべき
00:50 - A:短期的にはスキル成長の加速を強調し納得感を高める
Time Stamp
00:00 - Q: How to ensure fairness when goal difficulty differs across departments
00:19 - A: Ideally, senior managers should hold a calibration meeting to align difficulty standards
00:50 - A: In the short term, emphasize accelerated skill growth to build a sense of fairness
タイムスタンプ
00:00 - Q:一度決めた目標は期中に変更できないのか
00:06 - A:原則は変更不可だが、現実には変更が必要な場合もある
00:32 - A:目標変更を許容する4つの要件(非後退・記録・事前合意・頻度制限)
Time Stamp
00:00 - Q: Can a goal be changed once it's set, partway through the term?
00:06 - A: In principle no, but in practice changes are sometimes unavoidable
00:32 - A: Four conditions that make a change acceptable: not a downgrade, recorded, agreed with the subordinate beforehand, and not done too often
本コースにはAIの使用が含まれています。
●講師メッセージ: なぜ、今『目標設定と評価』が重要なのか?
私はこれまで多くの法人研修で、講師として評価に苦労する上司をサポートしてきました。今回、さまざまなノウハウを体系化して、目標設定から軌道修正、そして評価の伝達という一連のパッケージにしたのがこの講座です。評価に苦手意識を持つ方でも、大丈夫です。フレームワークを理解して、AIロールプレイで練習することで、気づけば部下との対話が苦にならなくなります。目標設定や評価は、管理職を縛るためのルールではありません。本来は、未来を語り、戦略を定め、組織を動かすためのエンジンです。ぜひ、組織を動かすリーダーへの第一歩としてご受講下さい。
────────
●講座概要
管理職にとって部下の評価は悩ましいものです。評価そのものもそうですが、その結果を部下に伝える面談に苦手意識を持っている方も多いでしょう。
これを乗り越えるのが当講座の目的です。具体的には、「評価伝達面談の5ステップ」により、部下の納得感を醸成する対話法を身につけていただきます。
あわせて、見逃せないのが「クオリティ高い目標設定」。実は、期末の評価でトラブルになるのは、多くの場合期初の目標設定が曖昧だから。したがって、目標設定~期中の観察・軌道修正~期末の評価を「マネジメント・サイクル」として一貫性を持って考えることが、評価における成功の近道です。
これにあわせて、本講座では目標管理制度(MBO: Management By Objective)を前提に、管理職研修・評価者研修にも活用しやすいよう、ケース演習、会話例、FAQ、AIロールプレイを多数盛り込んでいます。したがって、受講後には自信を持って部下と面談を実施できるようになります。
なお、個々の管理職もさることながら、「組織として」目標設定・評価の精度を高めることが、いま求められています。その理由の第一が、若手の退職予防。単に評価結果を伝えるだけでなく、任せる業務を適正化し成長実感につなげることは、評価制度と表裏一体の関係です。
加えて、「人的資本経営」や「戦略人事」に代表されるように、人の活用こそが企業の競争優位の源泉であるという、より大所高所の理由もあります。これを実現するために、当講座では評価制度をたんなる「季節のルーチン」と捉えるのではなく、全社戦略をブレークダウンした部署ごとの目標と接続するように設計しています。
●講座の特徴
特徴1:評価面談を「査定通知」ではなく「育成の対話」に変える
評価結果をいきなり伝えると、部下の反発や沈黙を招きがちです。本講座では、評価伝達面談を「場作り」「自己評価確認」「ギャップ埋め」「評価結果伝達」「改善計画討議」の5ステップで整理します。
部下の自己評価を確認し、上司評価とのギャップを、事実と評価基準をもとにすり合わせることで、納得感のある対話につなげます。評価を過去の判定で終わらせるのではなく、来期の行動改善と部下育成につなげる方法を学びます。
特徴2:目標設定と部下への意味付け<センスメイキング>
目標設定はビジネスの根幹をなすものですが、意外なほどそのノウハウは周知徹底されていません。当講座では、期間目標と期日目標、数値目標と状態目標、成果目標と行動目標などを踏まえ、具体的状況に応じて目標設定する方法を学びます。
あわせて、目標を伝達する際上司に求められるのが、「なぜその目標なのか」、「なぜあなたに任せたいのか」の説明です。当講座では、意味づけ(センスメイキング)の4ステップとしてこれを構造化して、再現性のあるスキルとして身につけていただきます。
特徴3:リアルなケース演習とAIロールプレイで実践できる
評価や目標設定は、知識を聞いただけでは現場で使えるようになりません。本講座では、成果は出ているがプロセスに課題がある部下、自己評価が高い部下、上司のフィードバックを受け流す部下など、管理職が実際に悩みやすいケースを扱います。
さらに、UdemyのAIロールプレイを通じて、評価面談や目標設定面談を練習できます。AIの部下を相手に、音声またはチャットで会話を進め、終了後にAIからフィードバックを受けることで、動画を見て終わりではなく、実際に「言える」「進められる」状態を目指します。
特徴4:初任管理職がつまずきやすいFAQにも対応
人事評価には、今さら聞きづらい悩みが数多くあります。
成果とプロセスのどちらを重視すべきか。裏方的な貢献をどう評価すべきか。未達だが成長している部下をどう扱うか。部門間で目標難易度に差がある場合はどう考えるか。期中の目標変更は許されるのか。
本講座では、このような現場の疑問にもFAQ形式で答えます。人事制度そのものを設計する講座ではなく、各社の評価制度・等級制度・評価基準を前提に、管理職が現場で迷いやすい場面にどう向き合うかを学ぶ実務講座です。
──────
●本講座は「戦略思考エンジン」の一部です
本講座は、単体の評価者研修ではありません。
会計で現状を把握し、戦略講座で方針を定め、ロジックツリー講座で課題や打ち手に分解し、目標設定・評価講座で部下の目標と評価に落とし込み、フィードバック講座で日々の行動変容を促す。
その一連のマネジメントプロセスの中で、本講座は戦略を現場の目標・評価・育成につなげる役割を担います。
目標設定と評価は、人事制度の運用にとどまりません。
人的資本経営や戦略人事を現場で機能させ、戦略実行を支えるための管理職の中核スキルです。
───────
●次に学ぶオススメ
・目標は設定したが、達成までの道筋が曖昧
→ 目標が具体的な課題・原因・打ち手に分解されていない可能性があります
→ ロジックツリー講座で、目標達成に必要な課題を整理し、具体的な行動に落とし込む方法を学びます
・評価や目標を伝えても、部下の行動が変わらない
→ 評価面談や目標設定だけでは、日々の行動改善までは継続しません
→ フィードバック講座で、部下の行動変容を促す対話と伝え方を学びます
・部下の目標が、会社や部門の戦略とつながっているか不安
→ 目標設定が個人業務の整理にとどまり、上位方針との接続が弱くなっている可能性があります
→ 戦略講座で、部門やチームの目標を会社の勝ち筋と接続する考え方を学びます
・評価への不満や納得感の低さが、職場の停滞につながっている
→ 評価制度そのものよりも、組織内の信頼感や貢献意識が損なわれている可能性があります
→ エンゲージメントUP講座で、組織の納得感を高め、前向きに動ける職場をつくる方法を学びます
・部下の目標や評価を考える前提となる、会社の現状認識に自信がない
→ 売上・利益・コスト構造などの数字を読めていないと、目標設定や評価の前提がズレることがあります
→ 決算書入門講座で、会社の状態を数字から読み解き、納得感ある目標設定につなげる力を身につけます
──────
●FAQ (よくある質問と回答)
Q1. この講座は、どのような人に向いていますか?
部下の目標設定や評価面談を担当する管理職、リーダー、新任管理職に向いています。また、管理職研修・評価者研修・階層別研修の教材を探している人事部門、研修企画担当者にも適しています。
Q2. 人事制度そのものを設計する講座ですか?
いいえ。本講座は、人事制度を設計する講座ではありません。各社の評価制度、等級制度、評価基準を前提に、管理職が目標設定・評価・面談をより適切に運用するための実務講座です。
Q3. MBOを導入していない会社でも役立ちますか?
役立ちます。本講座はMBOを前提に説明しますが、目標設定、進捗確認、評価面談、部下育成という流れは、多くの組織で共通します。自社の制度名や運用ルールに置き換えてご活用ください。
Q4. 評価面談が苦手な管理職でも受講できますか?
はい。むしろ、評価面談に苦手意識がある方に向いています。評価結果をいきなり伝えるのではなく、部下の自己評価を確認し、事実と評価基準をもとに対話する手順を学べます。
Q5. 成果とプロセスのどちらを重視すべきかも学べますか?
はい。成果評価とプロセス評価の考え方を扱います。成果が出ているがプロセスに課題がある場合、未達だが成長している場合など、管理職が迷いやすい場面について判断の軸を学びます。
Q6. AIロールプレイでは何を練習できますか?
評価面談や目標設定面談で、AIの部下を相手に対話を練習できます。納得しない部下、表面的には受け入れるが本心では受け流す部下など、実際の面談で起こりがちな場面を想定して練習します。
Q7. 管理職研修や評価者研修の事前学習に使えますか?
使えます。目標設定、評価、面談、AIロールプレイまでを短時間で体系的に学べるため、管理職研修・新任管理職研修・評価者研修の事前学習や復習教材として活用しやすい構成です。
Q8. この講座は人的資本経営や戦略人事とどう関係しますか?
人的資本経営や戦略人事を現場で機能させるには、管理職が部下の目標を会社の戦略と接続し、評価を通じて成長につなげる必要があります。本講座は、その現場実装にあたる目標設定・評価・面談の実務を扱います。
2026-05-14 19:24:31
Instructor Message: Why Goal Setting and Evaluation Matter Now
In my corporate training work, I have supported many managers who struggle with employee evaluation, performance review conversations, and goal setting. This course brings together those practical methods into one structured learning experience: setting goals, making course corrections during the period, and communicating evaluation results in a way that leads to employee growth.
Even if you feel uncomfortable with performance evaluation or evaluation meetings, you can learn a repeatable method. By understanding the frameworks and practicing through AI role-play, you will gradually become more confident in conversations with your team members.
Goal setting and evaluation are not rules designed to restrict managers. At their best, they are tools for discussing the future, clarifying strategy, developing people, and moving the organization forward.
I hope you will take this course as a first step toward becoming a leader who can connect people development with business execution.
────────
Course Overview
For managers and leaders, evaluating team members is one of the most difficult responsibilities. The evaluation itself can be challenging, but many managers find the evaluation meeting even more difficult, especially when they need to explain the result to the team member.
This course is designed to help you overcome that difficulty.
You will learn the five-step structure for performance review conversations, a practical method for creating employee acceptance and turning evaluation meetings into meaningful dialogue.
Another important theme is high-quality goal setting. In many cases, evaluation problems at the end of the period begin with unclear goals at the beginning of the period. That is why this course treats goal setting, observation, course correction, and evaluation as one integrated management cycle.
This course is based on MBO, or Management by Objectives. It is designed to be useful not only for individual managers, but also for manager training, evaluator training, new manager training, and corporate learning programs.
The course includes case exercises, conversation examples, frequently asked questions, and AI role-play. After taking the course, you will be better prepared to conduct evaluation meetings with confidence.
As a course bonus, you can also download the MBO Complete Worksheet, which helps you apply the course content to your own workplace.
Today, organizations need to improve the quality of goal setting and evaluation not only at the individual manager level, but as an organization. One reason is the need to prevent early turnover among younger employees. Evaluation is closely connected with assigning the right level of work, creating a sense of growth, and helping employees understand how their work contributes to the organization.
There is also a broader reason. Concepts such as human capital management and strategic HR show that people are a major source of competitive advantage. To make this real, evaluation systems should not be treated as a seasonal administrative routine. They should be connected to department goals that are broken down from company-wide strategy.
Course Features
Feature 1: Turn evaluation meetings from "rating notification" into developmental dialogue
If a manager suddenly communicates the evaluation result, the team member may become defensive, silent, or resistant.
In this course, performance review conversations are organized into five steps:
Creating the right atmosphere
Confirming the team member's self-evaluation
Closing the gap between self-evaluation and manager evaluation
Communicating the evaluation result
Discussing the improvement plan
By first understanding the team member's self-evaluation and then discussing the gap based on facts and evaluation criteria, managers can create a more constructive and convincing conversation.
The goal is not simply to judge the past. The goal is to connect the evaluation to behavior improvement, employee development, and better performance in the next period.
Feature 2: Learn goal setting and sensemaking for team members
Goal setting is at the core of business management, yet many managers have never learned how to set effective goals in a structured way.
In this course, you will learn how to set goals based on practical distinctions such as:
Period goals and deadline goals
Numerical goals and state goals
Result goals and behavior goals
You will also learn how to adjust goal setting depending on the specific situation and the level of the team member.
When communicating a goal, the manager also needs to explain why this goal matters and why this work should be assigned to that team member. This is sensemaking.
This course structures sensemaking into four practical steps so that managers can learn it as a repeatable skill, not as a matter of personality or intuition.
Feature 3: Practice through realistic case exercises and AI role-play
Goal setting and evaluation cannot be mastered by listening to explanations alone.
This course uses realistic cases that managers often face in the workplace, such as:
A team member who achieved results but had problems in the process
A team member with a high self-evaluation
A team member who appears to accept feedback but avoids real change
Through these cases, you will learn how to think, judge, and communicate as a manager.
You will also practice evaluation meetings and goal-setting conversations through Udemy's AI role-play feature. You can speak with or chat with an AI team member, practice the conversation, and receive feedback from AI after the role-play.
This helps you move beyond "watching a video" and toward being able to actually say the words and lead the conversation in the workplace.
Feature 4: Answers to common questions that new managers often struggle with
Performance evaluation raises many questions that are important, but often difficult to ask.
For example:
Should managers focus more on results or process?
How should behind-the-scenes contributions be evaluated?
How should a manager evaluate someone who missed the target but showed clear growth?
How should differences in goal difficulty between departments be handled?
Can goals be changed during the evaluation period?
This course answers these practical questions in an FAQ format.
This is not a course on designing an HR system from scratch. It is a practical course for managers who need to operate goal setting, evaluation, and performance review conversations within their company's existing evaluation system, grade system, and evaluation criteria.
────────
This course is part of the Strategic Thinking Engine
This course is not just a standalone evaluator training course.
It is part of a broader management learning path called the Strategic Thinking Engine.
In that learning path:
Accounting helps managers understand the current state of the business
Strategy helps managers decide where the organization should go
Logic trees help managers break issues and actions down into concrete steps
Goal setting and evaluation help managers translate strategy into team member goals and evaluation
Feedback helps managers support daily behavior change
Within this overall management process, this course plays the role of connecting strategy to goals, evaluation, and people development in the workplace.
Goal setting and evaluation are not just HR operations.
They are core management skills for making human capital management, strategic HR, and strategy execution work in the real workplace.
────────
Recommended Next Courses
You have set goals, but the path to achievement is still unclear
-> The goals may not yet be broken down into concrete issues, causes, and actions
-> In the Logic Tree Course, you will learn how to organize the issues needed to achieve goals and translate them into specific actions
You communicate goals and evaluation results, but your team members' behavior does not change
-> Evaluation meetings and goal setting alone do not sustain daily behavior improvement
-> In the Feedback Course, you will learn how to encourage behavior change through daily dialogue and feedback
You are not sure whether your team members' goals are connected to company or department strategy
-> Goal setting may remain only a summary of individual tasks, without enough connection to higher-level direction
-> In the Strategy Course, you will learn how to connect department and team goals to the company's winning strategy
Dissatisfaction with evaluation and low acceptance are leading to stagnation in the workplace
-> The real issue may not be the evaluation system itself, but a lack of trust and contribution awareness inside the organization
-> In the Employee Engagement Course, you will learn how to increase acceptance, contribution awareness, and positive action in the workplace
You are not confident in the business assumptions behind team member goals and evaluation
-> If you cannot read sales, profit, and cost structure, the assumptions behind goal setting and evaluation may become misaligned
-> In the Financial Statements Course, you will learn how to understand the state of the business through numbers and connect that understanding to more convincing goal setting
────────
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. Who is this course for?
This course is for managers, leaders, and new managers who are responsible for setting goals, evaluating team members, and conducting performance review conversations.
It is also suitable for HR departments and training planners who are looking for learning materials for manager training, evaluator training, or leadership development programs.
Q2. Is this a course on designing an HR evaluation system?
No.
This course is not about designing an HR system from scratch. It assumes that each company already has its own evaluation system, grade system, and evaluation criteria.
The focus is on helping managers operate goal setting, evaluation, and performance review conversations more effectively in the workplace.
Q3. Is this course useful if my company does not use MBO?
Yes.
This course explains goal setting and evaluation based on MBO, or Management by Objectives. However, the basic cycle of setting goals, checking progress, conducting evaluation meetings, and developing team members is common to many organizations.
You can adapt the course content to the terminology and rules used in your own company.
Q4. Can I take this course if I am not good at evaluation meetings?
Yes.
This course is especially useful for managers who feel uncomfortable with evaluation meetings.
You will learn how to avoid suddenly communicating the evaluation result, how to first confirm the team member's self-evaluation, and how to discuss the evaluation based on facts and evaluation criteria.
Q5. Does the course explain whether managers should focus on results or process?
Yes.
The course explains how to think about result evaluation and process evaluation. It covers situations where a team member achieved results but had problems in the process, or where the target was not achieved but the team member showed clear growth.
You will learn practical judgment points for situations where managers often hesitate.
Q6. What can I practice through AI role-play?
You can practice evaluation meetings and goal-setting conversations with an AI team member.
The role-play is designed around situations that often occur in real performance review conversations, such as a team member who does not accept the evaluation, or someone who appears to accept feedback on the surface but avoids real behavioral change.
Q7. Can this course be used as pre-learning for manager training or evaluator training?
Yes.
Because this course covers goal setting, evaluation, performance review conversations, and AI role-play in a short and structured format, it can be used as pre-learning or review material for manager training, new manager training, and evaluator training.
Q8. How is this course connected to human capital management and strategic HR?
To make human capital management and strategic HR work in the real workplace, managers need to connect each team member's goals with company strategy and use evaluation as a way to support growth.
This course focuses on the practical implementation of that idea through goal setting, evaluation, and performance review conversations.