Udemy
Turn what you know into an opportunity and reach millions around the world.
Learn More
Your cart is empty.
Keep shopping
Business Simulation: Strategic Decision-Making 50 Role Plays
Role Play
New
5 students

Business Simulation: Strategic Decision-Making 50 Role Plays

AI-Powered Business Simulation | 50 Business Strategy Mini-Games to Flex Your Executive Judgment Muscle | AI Role Play
Created byBoris Jovanovic
Last updated 10/2026
English

What you'll learn

  • Decide what deserves focus first when every option on the table genuinely matters — and name what you're knowingly putting at greater risk by choosing it
  • Take a real position on a trade-off (growth vs. margin, speed vs. control, scale vs. customization) instead of hiding behind "it depends"
  • Allocate scarce resources — budget, people, management attention — by concentration and binding constraint, not by spreading them thin to avoid conflict
  • Judge a strategic path (build vs. buy vs. partner, which market, which channel) by what the company becomes after years of walking it
  • Size a commitment to how reversible it actually is, and set your confidence threshold before you see the evidence, not after
  • Frame the actual decision a messy, ambiguous situation requires — before reaching for a recommendation — when nobody hands you a framework or a menu of options
  • Defend a recommendation live against an AI Devil's Advocate that challenges assumptions, rejects vague answers, and won't accept "it depends" as final position
  • Compare your own reasoning against a full sample solution and a worked decision memo after every one of the 50 cases

Course content

8 sections • 58 lectures • 3h 20m total length
  • Introduction4:28

Requirements

  • No prior strategy coursework or MBA required — each case gives you everything you need to build a defensible argument
  • Basic familiarity with how a business operates (revenue, margin, customers, competitors) is helpful but not mandatory; the cases explain the relevant numbers as they come up
  • A willingness to commit to an answer before checking the solution — this course is built around that discomfort, and skipping the attempt undercuts the entire method

Description

Note: This Course (Workout) contains the use of artificial intelligence:

- Udemy Role-Play AI feature to make the course more practical and interactive;

- AI-generated Voice-Over since some students complained about my heavy accent;

- AI-generated images (mostly thumbnails and different strategic paths) to illustrate business cases;

Mission: To help you build capabilities through interactive learning: Develop your Executive Judgment.

Guided Practice Description:

At some point, people won't ask you just to describe or analyze a situation — they'll ask for your recommendation. You'll have to make the call.

Years of reading books, watching courses, or studying frameworks can help you get there. But having a safe place to actually practice your executive judgment — that's priceless. It's the same as practicing martial arts: a good trainer can show you stances and technique, but to become proficient, you have to spar with a partner who hits back.

That's what this Workout is: your dojo for executive judgment.

50 cases. 6 stations. One AI Devil's Advocate who won't let you off easy. And carefully designed guidance and support.

This isn't a course where you watch someone else make decisions and take notes. Each of the 50 cases gives you a real, ambiguous business situation — with real numbers, competing priorities, and no single obviously correct answer — and then hands you off to an AI role-play character with a real stake in the outcome. They'll question your assumptions, reject vague answers like "it depends" or "move fast but manage the risk," and push you to defend exactly what you're willing to sacrifice to get what you want.

You are not competing against the AI. You're competing against the weaknesses in your own argument.

Six stations, each training a different decision-making muscle:

1. Prioritization — when everything matters, what matters first, and what are you deliberately putting at greater risk by choosing it?

2. Trade-offs — where do you draw the line, and under what condition does that line stop holding?

3. Resource Allocation — a priority without resources behind it is just an opinion; where does concentration actually matter?

4. Strategic Choices — judge a path by what the company becomes after walking it, not by how fast it looks on a slide

5. Decisions Under Uncertainty — size your commitment to how reversible it is, and set your confidence threshold before you see the evidence

6. Blind Challenges (The Championship Round) — no framework handed to you, no menu of options confirmed as right. Before you can decide well, you have to work out what you're actually deciding.

The difficulty escalates deliberately as you move through the stations — by the time you reach Blind Challenges, every scaffold the earlier stations built is deliberately pulled away, to test whether the underlying judgment actually transferred.

Three layers of guidance and support. You choose the intensity.

Every case follows the same ritual. A short video sets the scene and reframes why the case is harder than it looks — then, at the Spoiler Alert, you choose:

- Pause and attempt the Role Play cold. The highest-intensity version of the Workout.

- Keep watching for a second layer of coaching that sharpens your thinking without handing you the answer.

- After your attempt, open the Printout — a full written solution with the reasoning, a sample response, and the sacrifice it requires — to see how your call compares.

What's waiting: 50 cases, 6 stations, a Championship Round that hands you nothing, and a devil's advocate in every single one who won't let a weak argument pass just because it sounds confident.

The question isn't whether you can analyze a strategic problem — AI will do that with you all day. The question is whether you can still make the call, and defend it, when someone intelligent is trying to break it.

There's only one way to find out. Let's step on the mat.

Who this course is for:

  • Mid-to-senior managers and directors who already analyze business problems well but want more reps at the harder skill underneath: committing to a call, defending it, and naming what it costs — before a real promotion or board moment forces that first.
  • MBA students and recent grads who've absorbed the frameworks (Porter, BCG matrix, blue ocean, etc.) in class but have never had to defend a recommendation against someone actively trying to dismantle it.
  • Founders and functional leads (product, ops, finance, growth) stepping into cross-functional strategy calls for the first time, who need practice making trade-offs explicit rather than hoping consensus papers over them.
  • Strategy & management consultants, especially those early-to-mid career, who want deliberate practice defending a recommendation live, the way a client or partner actually pressure-tests one.
  • Anyone preparing for a case-interview-style process (consulting, strategy roles, general management rotations) who wants realistic pressure rather than static case PDFs.
  • Who this is not for: people looking for a lecture-style overview of strategy theory, or a certificate-focused course with passive video and a quiz at the end. This is deliberately uncomfortable, self-graded practice — the discomfort is the point