Margaret Soltan is an English professor at George Washington University in Washington DC. Her interest in twentieth century poetry and fiction is reflected in the title of her co-authored 2008 book, Teaching Beauty in DeLillo, Woolf, and Merrill (Palgrave Macmillan). She also authors a blog, University Diaries, which critiques the modern American university.
A Faculty Project Course - Best Professors Teaching the World
Why read a poem? Why write one? People say modern poetry as an art form is imperiled in our time, yet everywhere in the world cultures and individuals memorize, recite, and value various forms of poetry. This course will attempt to define this genre of poetry writing, to discuss its particular attributes, to distinguish between good and bad poetry, to explain why so much writing poetry is difficult, and to isolate the sorts of truths modern poetry seems best at conveying. Our focus will be on modern poetry, in English and in translation.
In my first lecture, I discuss the way my series - mainly focused on 20th and 21st century poetry in English and in translation - will be interested in micro as well as macro questions - everything from very basic definitions (What is a poem? How can we distinguish it from other modes of writing and utterance?) to large questions about meaning (What sort of meaning does a poem tend to yield? What is the poet's relationship to Truth, what a capital T? Can we derive wisdom from poetry that will help us lead our lives?).
The course will discuss, among other things, the pleasure we derive from poetry, the difficulty of much contemporary poetry, changes in poetic forms and themes over time, and distinguishing between good and bad poetry. I also analyze the first poem of this series - "Adelstrop," by Edward Thomas. As I'm reading and interpreting the poem, you should go to YouTube, Richard Burton reads Adelstrop, to read the poem on the screen, and to hear it recited. You can also find it in the next lecture.
Many people find twentieth and twenty-first century poetry from Europe and America to be difficult. The most famous poem written by America's most celebrated contemporary poet, John Ashbery (he just received the Presidential Humanities Medal) is "Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror" - a notoriously dense and challenging artwork. In this lecture, I'll look at that and a few other poems and consider why so much of the most-respected poetry of our time (think of T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land) is so hard to understand.
Using this essay by Brian Phillips as our background text, I'll talk about why it's so difficult, especially today, to bring a truly critical eye to poetry. There's so much poetry produced; yet for a variety of reasons (some of them having to do with the difficulty that I discussed in the last lecture) readers tend to be reluctant to judge the worth of any particular poem. As Phillips makes clear, the erosion in our time of a critical capacity in regard to art is a very bad development. I'll suggest ways to strengthen our confidence in our ability to discriminate between poetry of value and poetry that's really not worth our time. The main poem we'll look at here is Anne Sexton's "The Fury of Cocks."
Our next step in getting closer to poetry is to read what poets themselves have said, in letters and essays, about poetry in general, and about their own work. (We'll also look at some non-poetry-writing critics of modern and contemporary poetry.) How do poets themselves think about the act of writing a poem? What do they imagine themselves to be doing when they put words on the page? Some of the poets we'll read are Randall Jarrell (from the collection No Other Book), Ted Hughes, T.S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, Elizabeth Bishop, D.H. Lawrence, and James Merrill.
With this lecture, we'll begin in-depth readings of selected great modern and contemporary poems. "Sunday Morning" is generally considered to be among the best, most important, and, in some respects, most representative twentieth century poems. It combines an argument about the loss of religious faith with beautiful language that attempts to reconcile us to earthly life without a sense of the divine.
In considering this great meditation on life, beauty, and death, similar in important ways to the Stevens poem, we'll read some of the original French as well as the English translation, so as to get a sense of the sheer sonic pleasure and drama of the poem. We'll also talk about what's lost in the translation of poetry. What sort of transformation occurs when we translate a poem?
Here is another poem which places its speaker in the natural world and has her pondering, in a mood of crisis, life, beauty, and despair. We'll compare it to the poems we've already looked at, and I'll start making arguments about commonalities among the most valued, most-read, modern and contemporary poems.
The question of knowledge - how can we know the world; how much of the world can we know? - fascinates the modern poet, and Bishop's poem, with its famous final stanza about the profound difficulty of understanding existence, is perhaps the best-known expression in our time of the effort to pierce the mystery of life.
"Friday Night in the Royal Station Hotel" and "Absences," by Philip Larkin. "Brussels in Winter," W.H. Auden.
All of these great poems try to say something about nothing. They try to evoke those moments in life when our lives stop and disclose not the stirring sense of fullness "Adelstrop" conveys, but rather a sense of our paltriness - even our pointlessness - in a vast and enigmatic cosmic scheme.
Having read and analyzed these important modern and contemporary poems, we will try to come to some conclusions about what our best poets are trying to do - with language, and with ideas. I look forward to hearing from students with their ideas about poetry, and their suggestions for future lectures about poetry.
you looking for lecture or discussion about poetry then this is it!
A high-quality stimulating and thought provoking MOOC course, delivered with an impressive knowledge and enthusiam for the subject. Anyone at any academic level can get something out of this course. Margaret Soltan also airs her own opinions passionately in the lectures, which is a pre-requisite for all great teaching in my opinion. Teaching without a strong point of view is not teaching but recital. Ms. Soltan does not fall into this trap, and students should be aware that agreement with the points of view expressed are not compulsory. ;o) I thoroughly recommend this course to anyone who requires a deeper understanding of poetry and its debates, and for those wishing to come back 'up to speed' with the subject.
I loved this course and teacher, so I won't be difficult or oblique in expressing it. I'm a writer who never quite got poetry but now I think I gots it. Anyway, lovely stuff. I'm just sad our culture no longer honors poets, or even great writers like James Joyce anymore. It seems we are entering into a bit of a dark age. Thank you, Ms. Salton. Good stuff!
What a gift Margaret Soltan has given with this remarkable series of lectures. She shares her deep passion about poetry as well as her clear and insightful thinking about it. I did not always agree with her-- I do not have such a strongly ingrained existential perspective-- but I was always enlightened, entertained, and even moved by her examinations of the poets and poems she examined. I also loved and laughed at her very funny, yet persuasive, lecture on "bad poetry."