Udemy
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
Turn what you know into an opportunity and reach millions around the world.
Learn More
Your cart is empty.
Keep shopping
The Roots of Geopolitical Risk: Korea-Japan-South China Sea
Rating: 4.0 out of 5(2 ratings)
14 students

The Roots of Geopolitical Risk: Korea-Japan-South China Sea

The layers of history which led to the current geopolitical hotspots
Created byWayne Carroll
Last updated 12/2022
English

What you'll learn

  • The historical and present interconnectedness of the nations under review
  • The common thread and impact of China on these nations, and these nations' impact on China
  • The long journey of Korea from vassal state to empire to divided nation
  • The geopolitical and legal roots of a divided Korea- what it means for the region and the world
  • The evolution of Japan from secluded island nation to Imperial power, its wartime experience, and postwar pivot to pacifism, even aching it in its Constitution
  • How the rise of China is causing a rethink of Japan's constitutional pacifism
  • The political and legal challenges to the continued US military presence in Korea and Japan
  • Early Vietnam's Confucianist and Chinese roots, and later fights for autonomy
  • Vietnam's turbulent 20th century, moving from French colony to Cold War hotspot to independent Communist state
  • A view of the Vietnam War through the lens of the public international law of war, highlighting some of the limitations thereof
  • How the resources of the South China Sea are creating tensions in the region and fears of another World War

Course content

3 sections29 lectures3h 52m total length
  • Introduction to Korea7:30

    Regulating Early Korean Society: Confucianist and Buddhist foundation

    The religion of Buddhism found fertile ground in Korea and was a key factor influencing early Korean society. Ties with China led to ways of thinking from early Chinese Empires spreading to Korea and across Asia. One main influence was Confucianism. The philosopher Confucius believed that promoting introspection and human self-regulation- reinforced by societal shame for poor behavior- was preferable to formalized external rules and punishments for their breach. In early Korean society, this was manifested in the 3 Main Bonds and 5 Moral Rules.

    The right attitudes could be encouraged by focusing on the various relationships existing in society- within families (father-son, husband-wife, elder brother-younger brother), between members of society, and between individuals and their rulers. As in other regions touched by early Chinese philosophy and governance, Imperial Korea sought a strong civil service, with the selection of officials based upon a strict examination program. This foundation of the Korean approach to societal regulation would impact all subsequent iterations of governance and government.

  • The Imperial Era- from Three Kingdoms to Korean Unification3:48

    The Imperial Era- from Three Kingdoms to Korean Unification

    The Imperial era was a defining one for Korean society. While Confucianism set the tone for relations within society, a strong civil service defined government administration across the peninsula. Major kingdoms competed with each other for dominance, with the center of power shifting accordingly. Eventually the entire Korean peninsula was united in a single kingdom, ushering in an era of consolidation and integration.

    A key development during the Joseon dynasty was the development of the Hangul alphabet, with simplified characters compared to the Chinese characters historically used. This innovation helped the rulers improve literacy across the Korean nation, which was still primarily an agricultural one. The Joseon dynasty lasted through the late 19th century, when Asia was addressing the challenge of modernization. Japan had taken the lead, and exerted its power throughout the region.

  • From Hermit Kingdom to Japanese occupation5:08

    From Hermit Kingdom to Japanese occupation

    During the European mercantile period of the 16th and 17th centuries, trading companies pushed their way into Asia. When playing by the locals’ rules proved too slow, gunboat diplomacy helped the Europeans gain footholds in China and Japan. Korea, which had always considered itself “the shrimp between two whales (China and Japan), reacted by closing its doors to outsiders. This later earned it the nickname of “The Hermit Kingdom.”

    The strategy of isolationism only succeeded for so long. Japan, the rising power in Asia, gained control of Korea after winning the Sino-Japanese War. In the early 20th century, Imperial Japan consolidated its control over the Korean peninsula and exerted considerable influence over both the government and society in Korea. That also entailed the suppression of any resistance to Japanese hegemony. We explore this period during a visit to a former prison which housed thousands of Korean political prisoners, many of whom saw their last days there.

  • Crisis Period: World and Civil War2:45

    Crisis Period: World and Civil War

    By the time the Second World War was starting, Japan was firmly entrenched in Korea. The Imperial Japanese military instituted Japan’s policy of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, which extended throughout much of East and Southeastern Asia. Following the defeat of the Japanese in 1945, US forces controlled southern Korea, while Soviet forces held the north. When both sides withdrew, local political groups battled to define the future of Korea. Communist supporters squared off against more democratic-leaning forces. This eventually escalated to outright war when Communist forces, mainly from the north, tried to install a Communist regime across Korea. This triggered the creation of a United Nations (UN) coalition of forces to counter the Communist attack. A bloody conflict followed with heavy casualties, both military and civilian. It ended in 1953 with the signing of an armistice agreement, such that legally the war never really ended. There were now two versions and visions of Korea, a Communist one in the north, and a democratic one in the south, each claiming the political legitimacy over all of the Korean people.

  • A Visit to the DMZ5:41

    A Visit to the DMZ

    The Korean War was a rollercoaster conflict, with both sides almost managing complete victory. After years of fighting and parallel peace negotiations, the conflict ended in a stalemate. In fact, the two sides ended up controlling roughly the same area as at the end of World War II, with the 38th parallel marking an agreed boundary. As a result of the armistice talks, that boundary eventually became an international border, with the Communist Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in the north, and the democratic Republic of Korea in the south. That is the situation which remains to the present. Against the backdrop of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ), we examine the legal and diplomatic agreements which led up to the division, and which define the fragile peace on the Korean peninsula.

  • Side note: Preserving the Peace28:20

    The US military has maintained a significant military presence in South Korea since the armistice was agreed. Periodically the question of how much longer and how the US support should continue is raised in both Seoul and Washington. The political and security relationship between the two nations has evolved over the roughly seven decades since the founding of the Republic of Korea. This fascinating archival treasure presents a snapshot of the situation a quarter century after the ceasefire. Some of the issues raised in the film remain relevant today.

  • Separation, Sedition and National Security4:34

    Separation, Sedition and National Security

    The Republic of Korea, or South Korea, had a long journey to its current state of democracy. The military threat defined politics in the early decades, with national security concerns essentially resulting in a non-Communist military dictatorship. An amazing economic revival and the benefits of prosperity led to increasing steps towards full democracy. But national security, legally embodied in the National Security Act, still hung over Korean society. The tenuous situation with South Korea’s neighbors to the north led to both governments and the people preferring some degree of curtailment of civil liberties to address the ever-present threat of a return to armed hostilities. That stance only seemed to become more entrenched as North Korea developed its nuclear weapons capabilities and intercontinental ballistic missile program.

  • Forging a political and legal system2:44

    Forging a political and legal system

    National security concerns are balanced by fundamental rights anchored in the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Periods of low tension, particularly the so-called Sunshine Policy period at the turn of the millennium, even facilitated some loosening of the otherwise paramount national security legal umbrella. Nonetheless, a majority of Koreans still favors a retention of the National Security Act, despite the insistence on its abolition by North Korea. During a visit to the Korean Supreme Court, we trace the evolution of this all-important dynamic in modern Korean society.

  • Sunshine Policy, and Sunset- Continuing Division6:07

    Sunshine Policy, and Sunset- Continuing Division

    The Sunshine Policy period and more recent inner-Korean dialogue have led to hopes of a unification, or at least a normalization of relations. But progress has sometimes been a case of “one step forward, two steps back.” Meanwhile, an entire generation from families with members on both sides of the 38th parallel continues to fade. During a second visit to the border, we see the different ways in which Koreans deal with this personal tragedy. This includes both the practice of honoring ancestors (covered in the first Lecture) to a more light-hearted tourist approach to the realities of separation.

  • Where does Korea go from here?8:20

    Where does Korea go from here?

    The situation on the Korean peninsula remains as unpredictable as ever. Economic cooperation such as the Kaesong Industrial Complex (KIC) provided some glimmers of hope, only to be dashed when operations at the KIC are suspended or shut down. Missile tests by North Korea concern not only the neighbors to the south, but also others in the region. Japan worries about being a direct target, while China is concerned about a mass exodus across its border with North Korea should conflict return. The United States continues to be a key player in the region, and still has thousands of troops stationed in South Korea as a continuing legacy of the Korean War. President Donald Trump surprised many by actively cultivating a relationship with Kim Jong-Un, the third dynastic leader in North Korea’s history as a state. This even entailed a visit to Panmunjom and a mutual walk across the 38th parallel by the leaders. Whether that, or any other developments, leads to a change in North-South relations remains to be seen. The waiting game on the Korean peninsula continues, while the danger of nuclear conflict remains very real.

Requirements

  • None, though an interest in history and diplomacy, and curiosity about the world, helps
  • The Conflict, Security and Diplomacy series and podcasts on the Living Law® YouTube channel digs deeper into the public international law aspects of relevance

Description

If you are reading this page, you may be curious why there is a new Udemy course focusing on these particular countries. (Or perhaps you landed here by mistake, in which case, please read on nonetheless!). The reason is rather straightforward. Across our planet there are many latent, unresolved, historical conflicts which have become more acute due to recent events.

Perhaps nowhere is this more true than in the region under review in this course, which has seen more than its share of conflict and change in the past century. Living Law®'s approach to analysing the impact of history on today's geopolitical situation is to use the law as a frame of reference. Law reflects culture and culture drives law. Each of the three nations investigated here has its own legal system reflecting its recent history and current political reality.

The Republic of Korea has pursued a democratic form of government following a long period of military rule. Yet its very existence, along with peace in the region, depends on developments in its neighbour to the north, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Japan, for years the second largest economy in the world, still bears the imprint of its 20th century history. Unquestioning subservience to the Emperor has given way to a constitutional monarchy and a legal commitment to pacifism. Current headlines, particularly related to North Korean missiles fired over Japanese territory, highlight how heightened threats are causing Japanese leaders to rethink their stance on its military. Our final destination on this trip is Vietnam, a nation whose name was synonymous with conflict and war for several decades. Vietnam has undergone an economic transformation similar to China, creating prosperity for millions, but (also like China) without altering its fundamental political power structures.

What makes the dynamics of the so-called "Far East" (a Western-centric term) relevant for all of us is the potential for conflict and the risk of other nations being pulled into that conflict. First and foremost this means the United States, which for decades has had mutual defence treaties with both South Korea and Japan. The US still has thousands of troops stationed in the region under legal treaties which resulted from that conflict and these treaties are revisited periodically.

A number of recent events at the time of course creation have made familiarity with the history and political dynamics of this region more important than ever. One event whose significance grows by the day is the competition for the resources of the South China Sea. China claims the entirety of this area as its own, a stance which is disputed by its neighbours. This dispute already triggered legal proceedings focused on the Law of the Sea and other international legal norms, a topic we cover in the section on Vietnam. By taking the course you should be able to make better sense of today's headlines in what many fear will be an inevitable conflict over rights to natural resources embedded in this corner of the planet.


#Korea #Japan #Vietnam #South China Sea

Who this course is for:

  • businesspersons, educators and students, travellers, professional and armchair diplomats