
In this video meet the team that created the course and learn why should we care about surveillance technologies and what can you do to ensure they help rather than harm your community?
This lecture explains how existing U.S. privacy laws - both federal and state - fail to address the privacy and related risks raised by public use of surveillance technologies.
Brian Hofer, CEO of Secure Justice and Chair of the City of Oakland's Privacy Advisory Commission, explains what community control over surveillance is and how the City of Oakland is using this approach to manage surveillance technologies. This is part of the panel 'Meet the experts on Surveillance and Digital Rights' organized by Smart City PDX on October 9, 2021.
Please watch the video. Then check out the optional resources in Optional Resources to Dive Deeper before moving on to The CCOPS Model.
These resources provide deeper background on U.S. privacy laws, surveillance technologies and local surveillance ordinances.
Watch Making Smart Decisions About Surveillance. This video identifies the costs and consequences of surveillance, identifies steps for evaluating the risks of surveillance technologies and how to ensure accountability for use policies related to those technologies.
Watch this video before taking the Smart Decisions About Surveillance Quiz.
Watch Oakland ALPR Use Policy (12:08). This video walks through the Commission's draft Use Policy for ALPRs.
This course is intended to empower communities to create transparent, equitable, and inclusive processes for assessing smart city technologies and to train students across disciplines to understand the risks these tools pose and how their expertise can help ensure smart technologies serve the public good.
Smart city planning processes often fail to incorporate systematic methods to address privacy and equity concerns by engaging affected communities and ensuring equitable access to their benefits. Most communities lack explicit policies requiring review of law enforcement decisions to acquire and use surveillance technologies, which are disproportionately deployed against marginalized communities. In this course, students will learn how a growing number of communities have passed local laws and developed innovative processes for identifying and mitigating these risks.
After surveying the history of these efforts, the course compares and contrasts the programs created by three communities: the City of Oakland, CA, Santa Clara County, CA, and the City of Seattle, WA. Students then learn about some of the most commonly used surveillance technologies. Following a summary of how these programs relate to the broader field of information privacy and privacy impact assessments in the private sector, students walk through in detail the process the City of Oakland Privacy Advisory Commission used to evaluate Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRS). The course closes with a reflection on how these communities are changing how we approach data privacy in the U.S. and ways that students can address these risks in their own communities.