
Explore how generative AI creates new content using large language models and transformer-based architectures, and examine red teaming to ensure trust, safety, and alignment.
Explore generative AI red teaming to uncover security, safety, and trust issues by testing for outputs, data leakage, prompt injection, hallucinations, bias, and toxicity across model, system, and runtime layers.
Compare traditional red teaming with genai red teaming, shifting focus to model behavior, content generation, prompt manipulation, and socio-technical risks, while addressing model drift and ethical considerations.
Explore how the OWASP and NIST risk pillars—security, safety, and trust—frame vulnerabilities from data leakage and hallucinated facts to agent hijacking, guiding red teams across model behavior and training data.
Explore how the model itself becomes an attack surface, and learn to trace data flows from input prompts to execution, guarding against manipulation across LLMs, agents, and multimodal inputs.
Assess the RAG triad—relevance, accuracy, and groundedness—to test for hallucinations, ensure data grounding and traceability, and evaluate sociotechnical biases across edge cases.
Apply a lifecycle-based red teaming framework for gen AI, aligned with life cycle stages from acquisition to runtime, featuring four phases: model evaluation, implementation evaluation, system evaluation, and runtime evaluation.
Learn to measure, report, and disposition red team findings with metrics like prompt injections, data leakage, and hallucinations, and craft modular risk reports and remediation plans.
Leverage red team testing to identify prompt injection and jailbreaking vulnerabilities, applying layered defense, system prompts hardening, tokenizer based detection, and reinforcement learning with rejection RL to improve refusals.
Master adversarial prompt engineering and dataset design to probe alignment, policy filters, and ethical boundaries through red team testing, scoring model responses for risk and leakage.
Explore multi-turn attacks that exploit memory in gen ai systems, using context buildup and chain-of-thought reasoning. Red teamers test memory bound policies, interruption logic, and resets to preserve alignment.
Identify and mitigate hallucination, bias, and toxicity by red-teaming AI outputs across domains, scoring factual correctness, bias safety, and toxicity risk with retrieval augmented generation and transparent documentation.
Examine data poisoning, model extraction, and alignment bypass as advanced threats to LLM safety, with red teamers testing defenses across training, inference, and deployment using poisoned data.
Explore factuality, grounding, and response coherence tests in gen ai through red team prompts, citation checks, rag architectures, chain of thought prompts, and remediation workflows.
Stress test content filters and prompt firewalls with edge-case prompts and adversarial variations to measure refusals, accuracy, and resilience across obfuscated prompts.
Examine role-based access control and token hygiene to prevent RBAC misconfigurations and token leakage. Red team simulations reveal privilege escalation and strategies for strict scoping and token rotation.
Explore how system prompts shape AI behavior, test instruction retention across sessions and users, assess caching risks that can leak privacy or data, and replay completions in multi-turn tasks.
Understand how code generation can create risk, including sandbox escapes and unsafe commands. Red teamers test isolation, safety, and patterns like directory traversal and command injection to improve defense.
Explore API injection, template attacks, and dependency risks in lm systems. Test prompt to API mappings, input validation, and API calls to reveal misrouted data, privilege escalation, or RCE.
Strengthen GenAI observability by auditing prompt, action, and memory logs to detect evasion and enforce real-time, tamper-evident, session-based logging with RBAC.
Red teamers stress test data pipelines and simulate poisoning and external interface failures to verify whether the system degrades gracefully and to validate failover and safeguards.
Assess how AI confidence, tone, and visuals shape user trust and overtrust in enterprise tools. Explore red teaming methods to inject warnings, provenance, and verification prompts to prevent blind acceptance.
Explore how social engineering uses trust, urgency, and emotion, and how generative AI automates these tactics, from phishing emails to impersonation, and how red teams test and defend against them.
examine how multi-agent attack chains and decision hijacking unfold in autonomous ai systems, and show red team tests to enforce cryptographic signatures, memory boundaries, and role checking.
Develop chain-of-custody and traceability by red-team simulations of broken audit trails and memory edits, and enforce immutable logging, prompt versioning, model tagging, and tool-level logs.
Automate adversarial testing with static datasets and dynamic generation to benchmark robustness, detect brittleness, and continuously improve prompt safety and model alignment across CI/CD.
Explore red team playbooks and walkthroughs that simulate prompt injection, injection vectors, and retrieval risks to test models, agents, and workflows across a lifecycle of versioned, risk-tagged remediation.
Apply the RSI framework to define roles and responsibilities in AI security, using a RACI matrix to coordinate red teams, UX, ethics, and SOC across development, deployment, and defense.
This comprehensive course on OWASP GenAI Red Teaming Complete Guide equips learners with practical and strategic expertise to test and secure generative AI systems. The curriculum begins with foundational concepts, introducing learners to the generative AI ecosystem, large language models (LLMs), and the importance of red teaming to uncover security, safety, and trust failures. It contrasts GenAI red teaming with traditional methods, highlighting how risks evolve across model architectures, human interfaces, and real-world deployments. Through in-depth risk taxonomy, students explore OWASP and NIST risk categories, STRIDE modeling, MITRE ATLAS tactics, and socio-technical frameworks like the RAG Triad. Key attack surfaces across LLMs, agents, and multi-modal inputs are mapped to emerging threat vectors. The course then presents a structured red teaming blueprint—guiding learners through scoping engagements, evaluation lifecycles, and defining metrics for success and brittleness.
Advanced modules dive into prompt injection, jailbreaks, adversarial prompt design, multi-turn exploits, and bias evaluation techniques. Students also assess model vulnerabilities such as hallucinations, cultural insensitivity, and alignment bypasses. Implementation-level risks are analyzed through tests on content filters, prompt firewalls, RAG vector manipulation, and access control abuse. System-level modules examine sandbox escapes, API attacks, logging gaps, and supply chain integrity. Learners are also introduced to runtime and agentic risks like overtrust, social engineering, multi-agent manipulation, and traceability breakdowns.
Practical tooling sessions feature hands-on red teaming with PyRIT, PromptBench, automation workflows, and playbook design. Finally, the course addresses operational maturity—showing how to build cross-functional red teams, align roles with RACI matrices, and apply red teaming within regulatory and cultural boundaries. With case-driven instruction and security-by-design thinking, this course prepares learners to operationalize GenAI red teaming at both the technical and governance levels.