
Learn how imo regulates ghg targets via edi, eexi, and ci, and explore ship tech options like hull design, power limitation, wind assist, and dry dock optimization.
Examine dry-dock hull and propeller upgrades, including antifouling coatings, LR lubrication, BCF fins, and bulbous bow optimization. Learn why fuel gains are not additive and depend on sailing conditions.
Explore hull and propeller coating tech solutions to reduce maritime emissions and help ships meet IMO GHG targets.
Enhance ship efficiency through shaft generators, engine tuning, waste heat recovery, variable frequency drives, common rail injection, and turbocharger cut-out, achieving 3 to 15 percent gains.
Optimize ship operations to reduce the carbon footprint and improve CIA ratings with weather routing, speed management, trim and ballast optimization, and just-in-time arrival for efficient port calls.
Explore renewable propulsion technologies that supplement the main engine, including Flettner rotors using the Magnus effect, wind assist with kite sails, and on-deck solar pv.
Learn about the rigid wingsail system from Smart Green Shipping, featuring automatic deployment and wind-driven propulsion that can cut fuel emissions by up to 40% in optimal wind conditions.
Compare LNG, methanol, ammonia, hydrogen, biofuels, and e-fuels as maritime future fuels; evaluate energy density, safety, cost, and infrastructure on green shipping corridors.
"Well-to-Wake" has been the standard for lifecycle emissions in shipping for years. It still works methodologically — but the name itself is a holdover from a fossil-fuel era.
Green ammonia, green hydrogen, e-methanol — none of these come from a well. As the fuel mix shifts, shouldn't the terminology shift with it?
I've raised this with IMO — sharing it here to open up the conversation more broadly.
What do you think — is "Source-to-Wake" worth adopting, or does "Well-to-Wake" carry enough institutional weight to stay?
The maritime industry is undergoing its biggest transformation in history.
With the IMO tightening GHG reduction targets for 2030 and 2050, shipowners, operators, charterers, and maritime professionals must quickly adapt to a new world of regulations, efficiency metrics, and clean technologies.
This course, Maritime Emissions: Innovative Ship Tech for IMO GHG Targets, gives you a complete, practical, and updated understanding of the tools, technologies, and regulations shaping the decarbonization of global shipping.
By the end of this course, you will be able to:
Master the Regulatory Framework
Understand EEDI (new ships), EEXI (existing ships), and CII (operational rating)
Learn how ships are rated from A–E and what triggers corrective action plans
Decode the links between IMO DCS, SEEMP III, FuelEU Maritime, and the EU ETS
Explore Cutting-Edge Ship Technologies
Energy-saving devices: Mewis Ducts, pre-swirl stators, PBCF
Engine & shaft power limitations (EPL, ShaPoLi)
Hydrodynamic improvements and next-gen hull designs
Waste heat recovery and advanced propulsion concepts
Dive Into Future-Ready Vessel Design
CFD-driven hull optimisation
Air lubrication systems
Wind-assisted propulsion: Flettner rotors, wing sails
Tech pathways for meeting EEDI requirements in newbuilds
Achieve Operational Excellence for CII
Voyage optimisation & Just-In-Time arrival tools
Weather routing, digital twins, and improved SEEMP III execution
Hull performance management and robotics-based cleaning solutions
Understand the Economics & Compliance Strategy
Learn how EU ETS carbon costs impact voyage planning, chartering, and overall operating expenses
Understand energy intensity limits and how FuelEU Maritime influences fuel selection for ships trading in the EU
Compare different future fuels (LNG, Methanol, Ammonia, Biofuels, Hydrogen) based on cost, emissions performance, and regulatory readiness
Discover how shipowners build a practical compliance roadmap for meeting IMO’s 2030 and 2050 GHG reduction targets
Explore real-world decision frameworks: capex vs. opex trade-offs, retrofit ROI, and carbon-cost payback periods