Journalism Fundamentals: Reporting, Ethics & Craft

Name: Journalism Fundamentals: Reporting, Ethics & Craft
Rating: 3.6 (32 reviews)

Master news values, sourcing, verification, writing, press law, and the modern business of journalism

Role Play

Created byShamir George

Last updated 7/2026

English

English [Auto],

What you'll learn

Explain journalism's role as the Fourth Estate and its core democratic functions
Apply news values to evaluate whether a story idea is genuinely newsworthy
Cultivate sources, negotiate ground rules, and use anonymous sources responsibly
Verify claims, geolocate visuals, and detect AI-generated and manipulated media
Conduct interviews that yield revelation, including with powerful or vulnerable subjects
Structure hard news using the inverted pyramid and craft compelling leads
Write feature journalism with scene, character, and narrative arc
Navigate libel, privacy, contempt, and reporter's privilege across major jurisdictions
Apply professional ethics codes to real-world editorial dilemmas
Understand the modern news business, from subscriptions to AI to platform power

Course content

6 sections • 31 lectures • 2h 20m total length

The Fourth Estate: Journalism's Role in Democracy4:17
Why should anyone treat a reporter's questions as more than nosiness — what gives journalism its claim on power? This lecture resolves that tension by grounding the abstract idea of the 'Fourth Estate' in the real mechanics of accountability: how independent reporting holds governments, corporations, and powerful individuals answerable to the public, and why press freedom is treated as a precondition for democracy rather than a luxury. Tracing concrete turning points — the publication of the Pentagon Papers, the role of investigative newsrooms in exposing corruption — it shows how constitutional protections for the press differ across countries and why editorial independence sits at the center of them all. The goal is to leave you with a principled answer to the question every journalist eventually faces: why does this matter beyond the byline?
News Values: What Makes a Story Worth Telling4:19
Thousands of things happen every day and almost none of them become news — so on what basis does a journalist decide? This lecture answers that by unpacking news values, the century-old professional framework of timeliness, proximity, prominence, conflict, human interest, impact, and novelty, and showing how editors weigh them against each other. It explains why the same event can lead one outlet and vanish from another, how cultural context reshapes newsworthiness, and — the harder question — what happens when commercial or political pressure quietly distorts these judgments. You'll come away able to defend, out loud, why a given story deserves coverage, and to spot when 'newsworthiness' is being used as cover for something else.
Objectivity, Fairness, and Bias: What Impartiality Really Means4:14
Can any human being be truly 'objective' — and if not, is objectivity a lie journalism should abandon? This lecture cuts through one of the profession's oldest arguments by separating objectivity as a personal state (impossible) from objectivity as a discipline of method: transparent sourcing, testing your own assumptions, giving subjects a fair right of reply, and following evidence rather than allegiance. It examines the difference between neutrality and false balance (why 'both sides' can itself distort the truth), how unconscious bias shapes framing and word choice, and why fairness — not the fiction of a view from nowhere — is the standard most modern newsrooms actually hold. You'll finish with a working definition of impartiality you can defend and apply, not just recite.
Editorial Independence: Walls, Pressures, and Why They Matter4:12
If a newspaper's owner, biggest advertiser, or government wants a story softened, what actually stops it? This lecture answers by examining editorial independence as both a principle and a lived, contested reality — the structural safeguards serious newsrooms build (editorial charters, the 'church-and-state' wall between business and newsroom, ombudsmen) and the everyday pressures that test them. You'll learn to tell legitimate editorial guidance from inappropriate influence, understand how ownership concentration has historically threatened newsroom autonomy, and see why independence is not a condition you inherit but something defended daily through professional norms and editorial courage. The tension it resolves: independence is everyone's job, including yours as a junior reporter.
The Evolving News Ecosystem: From Print to Platform3:54
Who even makes 'the news' anymore — and does understanding that change your job before you've started it? This lecture maps today's fractured landscape: legacy print and broadcast, digital-native newsrooms, nonprofit investigative outfits, platform-distributed content, and the hybrids in between, each operating under different economic and editorial constraints. It explains why the collapse of print advertising forced newsrooms to reinvent how they're funded, what the tradeoffs are between subscription, donor, and ad-supported models, and how social platforms became powerful, unaccountable distributors of news. This is not background trivia — it defines the incentives, pressures, and openings you'll navigate for the rest of your career, which is why it belongs at the start.
Section 1 Quiz: Journalism and Democracy: Why This Work Matters
Continental Foods Story — Before It Runs

Building and Managing a Source Network4:14
How do you get people who have every reason to stay quiet to tell you the truth — and keep telling you? This lecture treats source-building as a career-long craft with real ethical stakes: identifying the right people for a beat, earning trust without surrendering your independence, and managing the relationship over time. It draws the crucial lines between on-record, on-background, and off-the-record, spelling out the responsibilities each carries and how to decide when to grant confidentiality and when to refuse it. It closes on source protection in an age of digital surveillance — why shielding a source is both an ethical duty and, sometimes, a legal battle, and why basic digital security has to become routine reporting hygiene, not an afterthought.
The Art and Craft of the Journalistic Interview4:10
An interview is where knowledge moves from someone else's head into your notebook — so why do so many of them yield nothing usable? This lecture walks the full lifecycle of the interview to answer that: pre-interview research, question design, the different dynamics of face-to-face, phone, email, and on-camera formats, active listening, and handling evasive, hostile, or emotional subjects. You'll learn to build a 'question ladder' that climbs from scene-setting to the genuinely hard material, why an unscripted follow-up almost always beats a prepared question, and how to keep someone talking without leading them. It also confronts the ethics that separate a professional from a predator: consent, recording, and how to interview trauma survivors and vulnerable subjects effectively and humanely.
Beat Reporting: Owning a Subject Area4:00
Why does the reporter who has covered the courts for three years break stories the parachuting generalist never sees coming? This lecture answers by making the case for the beat — covering courts, city hall, health, or finance with enough sustained depth to become an authority in your own right. You'll learn to map a beat systematically (its institutions, key documents, officials, and recurring story cycles) and to build the background knowledge that lets you ask sharper questions and notice when something is genuinely off. It covers the rhythms of the work, from daily monitoring to the long investigative arcs that only surface after months of immersion, and confronts the beat reporter's central tension: the access that comes with familiarity versus the independence the job demands.
Investigative Reporting and Public Records4:18
What separates a story a source hands you from one you dig out of a paper trail nobody wanted you to find? This lecture opens the door to investigative reporting — the accountability journalism built on documents, data, and dogged persistence rather than a single tip. It introduces public-records law (Freedom of Information / FOIA-style requests and their equivalents), how to find and read court filings, corporate registrations, budgets, and inspection reports, and how to structure a long investigation without drowning in material. It also covers the human side: cultivating whistleblowers, managing risk to sources and to yourself, and the discipline of following evidence where it leads even when it contradicts your hypothesis. The tension it resolves: how a beginner starts building the paper-trail skills that produce the profession's most important work.
Verification: The Discipline That Separates Journalism from Noise5:30
In a feed full of rumor, propaganda, and content farms that all look like news, what actually makes journalism different? The answer is verification, and this lecture treats it as a systematic discipline rather than a vibe: corroboration, source triangulation, document authentication, and the structured skepticism a good reporter applies to every claim — including ones from trusted authorities. You'll learn to verify identities, locations, dates, and statistics; to read official documents critically; and to use reverse image search, metadata tools, and public records to ground-truth visual and documentary evidence. Through famous verification failures and what they cost the newsrooms involved, it makes concrete the stakes of getting it right every single time — not to shame, but to show why 'trust but verify' is really just 'verify.'
Fact-Checking Workflows: Building Accuracy Into Your Process4:10
If everyone agrees accuracy matters, why do careful reporters still get things wrong — and how do you stop being one of them? This lecture answers that the fix isn't 'try harder' but a specific, repeatable process built into the work from the first interview. You'll learn to keep a running fact file as you report, construct a systematic pre-publication check that touches every verifiable claim, and handle the real-world problem of checking facts that require expertise you don't have. It distinguishes in-house pre-publication fact-checking from the separate discipline of organizations that fact-check public claims after the fact, and how their standards differ. You'll leave with a personal fact-checking template you can adapt and apply to your very next piece.
Section 2 Quiz: Reporting: Sources, Interviews, and Beats
Tip Call: Ridgeline School Fire Inspections

The Inverted Pyramid: Why It Works and When to Use It3:51
Why has a writing structure invented for 19th-century telegraph wires survived every technological upheaval since? This lecture answers by dissecting the inverted pyramid — most important information first, details in descending significance — and showing that its staying power comes from how readers actually behave: they scan, they scroll, they leave. You'll learn to identify the single most newsworthy element of a story and build a lead around it, to sequence secondary and tertiary material so every paragraph earns its place, and — critically — to recognize when the pyramid is the right tool and when a different structure will serve the story better. It includes a working breakdown of lead types (summary, delayed, anecdotal) and clear criteria for choosing between them.
Writing the Lead: Your First 40 Words Are Everything3:36
A reader decides whether to keep going in about a sentence — so how do you win that decision without cheating them? This lecture zeroes in on the lead as the most consequential thing a journalist writes, analyzing what makes one work: specificity, active voice, a clear subject and verb, and real news value in the very first line. You'll study the main lead types and when each fits, learn to diagnose and fix the classic failures (burying the news, leading with attribution, piling up context before the point), and build an editing instinct for your own openings. It also tackles the digital reality where the lead partners the headline for search and social sharing, and shows how to write one that's both journalistically strong and algorithmically effective — without selling out either.
Feature Writing: Narrative, Character, and the Long View3:52
How do you hold a reader for 3,000 words when a news brief could deliver the facts in 200 — and why would you? This lecture answers by teaching the feature as the journalism of depth, built to create understanding rather than just report an event. It breaks down the machinery: the anecdotal lead that pulls readers in, the nut graf that justifies the story's length, the body that develops a coherent arc, and the kicker that lands with resonance rather than summary. You'll learn to find the 'spine' that gives a feature its emotional and intellectual coherence, to use scene, character, and detail to make abstract subjects human, and to manage the far larger reporting load long-form demands — all while keeping the line between feature, opinion, and analysis clear.
Headlines, Decks, and Captions: Writing the Furniture3:09
For most people the headline is the whole story — so is it fair to treat it as an afterthought? This lecture argues no, and teaches the 'furniture' of a story (headlines, decks, captions, pull quotes) as a distinct, demanding form of writing. You'll learn the grammar of headlines and why they lean on present tense and active voice, how to be both accurate and compelling without sliding into clickbait, and how search optimization has reshaped — and sometimes distorted — headline craft in digital newsrooms. It gives special attention to captions, often the most-read text on a page and a real source of legal exposure when they misidentify people or misrepresent events, and lays out the standards professional desks apply to every line before it publishes.
Clarity, Precision, and Plain Language in Journalism4:11
If you truly understand something complicated, why is it so hard to make a stranger understand it too — and whose failure is that? This lecture locates the answer in language habits that quietly sabotage clarity: passive constructions, jargon, nominalization, throat-clearing preambles, and reflexive over-qualification. You'll get practical techniques to hunt these down, to explain technical, legal, and scientific ideas accurately in plain terms, and to pitch vocabulary to your audience without talking down to them, drawing on the plain-language tradition and major newsroom style guides. It closes on the underrated discipline of self-editing — reading your own work with a reader's skepticism instead of a writer's affection — and hands you a structured revision process for tightening any piece before it ships.
Working With an Editor: How Copy Gets Better3:42
Why does your carefully finished draft come back covered in changes — and is that an attack or the best thing that happens to your work? This lecture demystifies the editing relationship, the mostly invisible engine that turns competent copy into published journalism. It walks through what different editors actually do (assigning, line editing, copy editing, and the crucial second read for accuracy and legal risk), how to file clean copy that respects their time, and how to take a tough edit without either caving on the facts or defending every comma out of ego. It also covers the collaborative side of pitching, negotiating scope and deadlines, and using questions from an editor as an early-warning system for the holes readers would have found. The tension it resolves: editing feels personal, but learning to be edited well is how you get good fast.
Section 3 Quiz: Writing for News: Structure, Style, and Story
Draft Review: Water-Rate Story, Deadline Tonight

Defamation and Libel: Your Legal Exposure as a Journalist4:54
Publish one false statement of fact that damages a reputation and you can be sued anywhere you're read — so how do working journalists write hard stories about powerful people at all? This lecture answers by breaking defamation down to its elements: a false statement of fact, published to a third party, that harms someone's reputation, and what a claimant must prove in libel (written) versus slander (spoken). You'll learn the pivotal distinction courts draw between public figures and private individuals, why the 'actual malice' standard in some jurisdictions gives reporters real protection when covering officials, and which defenses (truth, fair comment, privilege) hold up. It closes with the trap of republication — why repeating someone else's false claim can make it yours — and a practical risk-assessment framework that flags danger without chilling legitimate reporting.
Privacy, Contempt, and Privilege: The Other Legal Pillars5:18
You have the story, it's true, and publishing it could still land you in serious legal trouble — how? This lecture answers by mapping the legal terrain beyond defamation, where the rules vary sharply by jurisdiction but ignorance never protects you. It covers privacy as it collides with journalism (when someone has a reasonable expectation of it, when public interest overrides it, and how digital life scrambled the old norms), and contempt of court rules that restrict what you can report about ongoing criminal proceedings — with fines or jail for getting it wrong. It ends on qualified and absolute privilege, the protections that let you report accurately on parliament, courts, and official proceedings without incurring defamation liability, and how to invoke them correctly rather than assume them.
Reporting in a Global and Digital Legal Landscape3:57
Your story lives on a server in one country, describes events in a second, and is read in a third whose libel laws are far friendlier to the powerful — so whose law applies to you? This lecture confronts the jurisdictional reality that unsettles digital-age journalists: 'libel tourism,' the reach of foreign courts, and why the internet erased the old assumption that you only answer to your own country's press law. It surveys how legal regimes differ — from strong constitutional press protection in some countries to criminal defamation and 'right to be forgotten' regimes in others — and what that means for cross-border reporting, corrections, and takedown demands. Without pretending to replace a media lawyer, it gives you the situational awareness to recognize when a story carries legal risk you cannot assess alone, and when to ask for help before you publish.
Copyright, Fair Use, and Using Others' Material4:57
Can you quote that report, embed that tweet, run that photographer's image, or lift a paragraph from a rival's scoop — and where exactly is the line? This lecture resolves the everyday legal confusion around using material you didn't create, covering copyright basics, the limited protection of fair use / fair dealing for reporting and criticism, and why attribution is an ethical duty but not a copyright license. It addresses the modern flashpoints: screenshots and social media content, user-generated images from news events, embedding versus copying, and the difference between reporting a fact (not protected) and copying someone's expression of it (protected). You'll come away able to spot when material is safe to use, when you need permission, and when 'everyone does it' is exactly the reasoning that gets a newsroom sued.
Section 4 Quiz: Press Law: Reporting Within the Rules
Legal Read-Through: Hospital Fraud Story

Journalism Ethics: The Standards That Define the Profession5:10
When the law permits something but it still feels wrong, what does a journalist actually reason from? This lecture answers by showing that ethics is not abstract morality but a working system of professional norms governing how you gather information, treat sources and subjects, and make judgment calls — norms that build public trust when honored and destroy credibility when broken. It surveys the frameworks newsrooms lean on, from the utilitarian calculus of minimizing harm while maximizing public benefit to deontological commitments to honesty and fair process regardless of outcome. Built around real scenarios — paying for information, deception in undercover reporting, conflicts of interest, covering suicide and trauma, using anonymous sources — it helps you develop a decision-making framework that goes beyond memorized rules to genuine moral reasoning under pressure.
Conflicts of Interest and Editorial Integrity4:35
Your brother works for the company you're about to investigate, or you own its stock, or you liked its CEO's post last week — which of these compromises you, and who gets to decide? This lecture resolves the murk around conflicts of interest, defined broadly as anything that could — or could appear to — compromise your independence: financial holdings, personal relationships, political affiliations, outside work, freelance arrangements, and social media activity. You'll learn why the appearance of a conflict can damage credibility as badly as a real one, how disclosure and recusal actually work, and why raising a potential conflict with your editor early beats hoping it goes unnoticed. It widens the lens to the structural conflicts that shape whole newsrooms — editorial versus commercial, access versus accountability — giving you language to think critically about systemic pressures, not just personal ones.
Covering Vulnerable People: Consent, Care, and Responsibility4:16
The most important story of your career might depend on someone at the worst moment of their life — so when is 'they agreed to talk' not good enough? This lecture answers that the standards for covering vulnerable subjects (crime victims, refugees, people in mental-health crisis, children, at-risk whistleblowers) are more demanding precisely because those subjects have less power to protect themselves. It works through obtaining meaningful informed consent, explaining honestly what publication will mean in practice, weighing a subject's immediate willingness against their longer-term interest, and knowing when to decline an interview a subject is offering. Drawing on newsroom best-practice guidelines for suicide, sexual assault, child subjects, and mental-health crisis — and the evidence behind them — it equips you to decide with both professional confidence and real human care.
Plagiarism, Fabrication, and the Trust Contract4:51
Why is inventing a single quote or lifting a few sentences treated as a career-ending offense when far more consequential mistakes are merely corrected? This lecture answers by locating plagiarism and fabrication at the center of journalism's core promise: that what you report is real and yours. It defines both precisely — including the grey zones of over-reliance on press releases, undisclosed re-reporting, and 'patchwriting' — and dissects landmark scandals to show how quickly they collapse a journalist's and an institution's credibility. It then turns practical: attribution habits that keep you safe, note-keeping discipline that lets you prove what a source actually said, and the honest handling of errors through timely, transparent corrections. The tension it resolves: trust is the entire product, and it is destroyed far faster than it is built.
AI, Misinformation, and Ethics in the Newsroom Today4:46
When anyone can generate a convincing fake photo, quote, or entire 'article' in seconds, what is a journalist's new obligation — and where does AI help versus harm? This lecture confronts the ethics of the current moment: the flood of mis- and disinformation, deepfakes and synthetic media, coordinated manipulation campaigns, and the responsible (and irresponsible) uses of generative AI inside newsrooms for drafting, translation, and data work. It covers the discipline of debunking without amplifying, the transparency owed to audiences when AI touches a story, and the accuracy and bias risks of leaning on automated tools. Rather than treating technology as either savior or villain, it gives you a principled, working stance — one that upholds verification and honesty as the tools change faster than the rulebooks can.
Section 5 Quiz: Ethics: The Standards That Define the Profession
Investor List - Before We Publish

Data and Visual Journalism: Telling Stories With Evidence5:35
Some truths are invisible in any single interview and only appear when you count — so how does a reporter turn a spreadsheet into a story a reader feels? This lecture introduces data journalism as a reporting method, not a coding specialty: sourcing and cleaning data, interrogating it skeptically (correlation is not causation, and 'the data' can lie as easily as a source), and finding the human story inside the numbers. It then covers visual journalism — charts, maps, and infographics — and the ethics specific to them: misleading axes, cherry-picked ranges, and the responsibility not to distort through design. It closes on photojournalism and video ethics, from the limits of acceptable editing to the duty of care in publishing graphic imagery, so you can work honestly in the formats modern audiences expect.
How News Organizations Make Money and Why It Shapes Coverage5:38
Why does one newsroom chase clicks, another guard a paywall, and a third court wealthy donors — and how does each choice bend the journalism produced? This lecture answers by surveying the main models funding modern news: advertising (display, programmatic, native), subscriptions and paywalls, public and nonprofit funding, membership, and hybrids. Crucially, it connects each model to the editorial incentives and vulnerabilities it creates — why ad dependence can chill coverage of major advertisers, why subscriptions can privilege paying audiences over public-interest work, and why even nonprofit journalism carries donor-influence risk. Absorbing the arc of the advertising collapse, the rise of Google and Facebook, and the spread of 'news deserts,' it hands you a comparative framework for reading any newsroom's business structure and predicting the pressures baked into it.
Platforms, Algorithms, and the Fight for the Audience5:26
If an algorithm you can't see decides who reads your work, how much editorial control do you actually have — and what should you do about it? This lecture examines journalism's uneasy dependency on digital platforms: how algorithmic curation displaced editorial curation as the main force deciding what news people encounter, and what that means for both journalistic autonomy and the democratic information supply. It walks through how newsrooms have fought back — SEO strategy, newsletters, podcasts, and push notifications that build direct audience relationships beyond any single platform's favor — and frames the central strategic tension between reach (maximizing audience through platforms) and relationship (loyal audiences you own). The stakes it resolves: the choices a newsroom makes here determine not just its traffic but its long-term survival.
Sustainability and Innovation: The State of the Industry5:02
If the old model is broken and the industry keeps shrinking, is there any honest reason for optimism about entering journalism now? This lecture answers with evidence rather than cheerleading, surveying what's actually working: investigative nonprofits, local news startups, reader-supported membership organizations, collaborative reporting networks, and newsrooms built around underserved communities. It examines which models are reaching real financial sustainability, why scale and geography matter so much to news economics, and how the rise of journalism philanthropy creates fresh opportunities alongside new dependencies. It closes with a clear-eyed assessment of where the field genuinely stands — the real progress, the persistent gaps in local and international coverage, and the structural problems no business model alone can fix — so you enter with hope grounded in reality.
Building Your Career: Portfolio, Beat, and First Bylines6:49
You've learned the craft — but how does a person with no newsroom job actually become a working journalist? This capstone lecture resolves the gap between competence and a career. It covers building a portfolio from scratch (pitching freelance stories, local coverage, and the beat you can own before anyone hires you), how to pitch editors so they say yes, and how to develop a specialty that makes you findable and valuable. It addresses the realities of the modern path — freelance economics, staff versus contract work, ethics and independence while building a personal brand online, and safety and burnout in a demanding profession. The tension it resolves: journalism is learned by doing, so the lecture ends by turning everything in the course into a concrete first move you can make this week.
Section 6 Quiz: Modern Craft and Career: Where Journalism Goes Next
Pitch Call: Eviction Filing Story

Requirements

A strong command of written English at the college level
Curiosity about current events and the news media landscape
Willingness to think critically about ethics, power, and public interest
Basic comfort with internet research and digital tools
No prior journalism experience or formal media education required

Description

This course contains the use of artificial intelligence.

Journalism in 2026 is more important and more contested than at any point in living memory. Readers are flooded with synthetic media, platform algorithms decide which stories reach them, and the financial models that once funded local reporting have collapsed in much of the world. In that environment, the fundamentals of the craft, including verification, fair sourcing, clear writing, and ethical judgment, are not nostalgic relics but the core skills that separate journalism from everything else competing for attention. This course gives you those fundamentals in a single, structured journey.

You will begin with the role of journalism in democracy, exploring why an independent press exists and what functions it performs. From there you will move into news values and the daily decisions editors make about what counts as news, followed by deep coverage of sourcing and verification, including how to handle anonymous sources, how to spot manipulated media, and how to use freedom of information laws to extract documents from public institutions. A full section on interviewing covers everything from confronting evasive officials to interviewing trauma survivors with care. You will then learn the structural craft of news writing, including the inverted pyramid, lead writing, quotation, headlines, and the longer arcs of feature journalism. Press law and ethics receive their own dedicated section, covering libel, privacy, contempt, reporter's privilege, codes of ethics, conflicts of interest, fact-checking workflows, and the corrections culture that defines trustworthy newsrooms. The course closes with the economics of news, including subscriptions, advertising, nonprofit models, platform dependency, artificial intelligence, and the realities of building a journalism career today.

This course is built for aspiring journalists, communications and media students, public relations professionals who work alongside reporters, and engaged citizens who want to understand how news is actually made. No prior journalism experience is required. By the end you will be able to evaluate the newsworthiness of a story idea, plan and conduct a rigorous interview, structure a news article from lead to kicker, recognize the major legal hazards in a piece of reporting, apply a coherent ethical framework to hard editorial decisions, and speak fluently about the business pressures shaping the profession.

What sets this course apart is the integration of timeless craft with the realities of journalism as it is practiced in 2026, including AI in the newsroom, platform power, and the global press freedom landscape. Every lecture grounds principles in concrete examples drawn from real reporting, and every section builds toward the kind of clear-eyed, principled, useful work that has always defined the best journalism. Enroll now and start building the skills, instincts, and judgment that the next generation of trusted reporters will be known for.

Who this course is for:

Aspiring reporters preparing for their first newsroom role or freelance career
Journalism, communications, and media students seeking a structured foundation
Public relations and communications professionals who work with journalists
Content creators and newsletter writers who want to apply journalistic standards
Engaged citizens who want to understand and evaluate the news they consume

Journalism Fundamentals: Reporting, Ethics & Craft

What you'll learn

Explore related topics

Course content

Journalism and Democracy: Why This Work Matters6 lectures • 21min

Reporting: Sources, Interviews, and Beats7 lectures • 26min

Writing for News: Structure, Style, and Story7 lectures • 22min

Press Law: Reporting Within the Rules5 lectures • 19min

Ethics: The Standards That Define the Profession6 lectures • 24min

Modern Craft and Career: Where Journalism Goes Next6 lectures • 29min

Requirements

Description

Who this course is for: