
Explore ISTQB automotive software tester exam, a foundation-to-specialist path with objective questions, online proctoring, 60 minutes plus 15 minutes for non-English countries, and a standards and automotive testing techniques syllabus.
Explore how divergent project objectives drive increasing product complexity in automotive software, balancing OEM models, variants, configurations, and customer needs while maintaining time, cost, and quality.
Learn how standards influence project aspects in automotive software testing, including time, cost, quality, and risk, and explore the six generic phases of the system lifecycle from concept to retirement.
Explore the tester's key role in automotive release processes, from exit criteria and maturity to release items, embedded systems, test reports, and prioritizing features for deployment.
Dive into chapter 1 of the istqb automotive software tester course with sample questions on the system life cycle stages—concept development, production, utilization, support, retirement—and the impact of standards.
Explore standards for testing electrical and electronic automotive systems and learn how the space standard uses process and capability dimensions, eight process groups, and three categories to guide quality.
Explore capability levels and dimensions in automotive software testing standards, from level zero incomplete processes to level three established processes, with levels four and five out of scope.
Explore E-Space automotive standards, outlining levels one to three for process capability, assessment indicators, and key attributes such as process performance, performance management, and work product management.
Define automotive testing strategy and regulation testing under the standard, emphasizing early testing, simulated vs real-time environments, and embedded hardware. Apply risk-based regression and standard work products per ISO/IEC 29119-3.
Understand the automotive unit verification through a strategy guiding dynamic testing, static analysis, and code reviews. Examine bidirectional traceability, regression testing, and verification criteria ensuring requirements and design alignment.
Explore functional safety and safety culture in automotive software, guided by ISO 26262, and how testers foster risk-aware, lifecycle-wide safety through early testing and shared responsibility.
Integrate the tester into the automotive safety lifecycle by planning and validating requirements, designing tests, and executing static and dynamic verification across the concept, development, and production/maintenance phases.
explains the iso 26262 structure and maps tester-relevant volumes, showing how volumes 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8 cover terminology, software verification, hardware interfaces, and process support.
Explore how ASIL levels influence risk reduction and the extent of testing, and how test techniques and types vary with safety criticality.
Explore how CTFL concepts align with ISO 26262 using method tables to select recommended automotive testing techniques, including test design techniques, static analysis, non-functional tests, and environments.
Autosar: automotive open system architecture, its three-layer structure (swc, basic software, and runtime environment), and how testers leverage simulations, virtual environments, and system integration tests.
Compare ISO 26262 and E-Space with foundation level concepts, mapping test levels for hardware and software in automotive end products, and apply techniques like boundary value analysis and decision tables.
Explore chapter two sample questions from the ISTQB automotive software tester course, focusing on ISO 26262 volumes 4 and 6, system versus software development, and code coverage approaches.
Explore how automotive testers use virtual test environments to simulate ECUs, hardware, and environment models, enabling early, safe, and realistic testing with stubs and drivers.
Compare open loop and closed loop control in automotive test environments, highlighting how inputs and disturbances drive outputs, while noting essential interfaces, databases, and communication protocols for ECU testing.
Learn model-in-the-loop testing by validating a controller against a simulated plant in MiL environments, enabling closed-loop verification and early development through non real-time simulations.
Explore software-in-the-loop (SiL) testing by generating C-code from the controller model and validating it against the MIL model. Understand how test environments and wrappers support back-to-back simulation.
Explore hardware in the loop (HiL) testing, moving from model- and software-in-the-loop setups to real-hardware testing with a real-time plant interface.
Compare mil, sil, and hil test environments across criteria such as closeness to reality, effort, maturity, test item access, and test preparation to help testers evaluate advantages and disadvantages.
Explore the comparison of xil test environments to address test objectives across hil, mil, and sil contexts, emphasizing early defect detection and front loading via the test manager.
Explore sample questions on chapter 3 of the ISTQB automotive software tester course, covering virtual testing environments, hardware-in-the-loop concepts, environment models, interfaces, and integration testing.
Explore static testing and MISRA-C:2012 guidelines for automotive software, including static analysis, coding standards, and the three obligation levels to improve early defect detection.
Explains quality characteristics for reviews of requirements in static testing, highlighting verifiable, unambiguous, consistent, complete, bounded, and singular requirements guided by ISO/IEC 29148:2011 for early defect detection.
Master dynamic test techniques for automotive software testing, including condition testing, multiple condition testing, and modified condition/decision testing. Learn how these approaches affect coverage and test efficiency.
Back-to-back testing compares results across software variants with same core functionality to identify divergences, using three stages—test case preparation, execution, and automated analysis—benefiting automotive testers.
Learn fault injection testing to improve test coverage by injecting faults into test code and runtime interfaces, validating error handling and recovery in automotive software.
Design tests directly from requirements using requirements-based testing, and combine dynamic techniques, exploration, and regression to improve coverage when requirements are incomplete or inconsistent.
Understand context-dependent selection of automotive dynamic test techniques. Apply ISO 26262 level guidance and test basis factors to pick suitable white-box or black-box approaches.
Explore how to select dynamic test techniques for automotive software by evaluating requirement-based testing, boundary value analysis, back-to-back testing, and the risk of undetected defects across automotive safety integrity levels.
Explore automotive static and dynamic test techniques from chapter four, with seven sample questions on MISRA 2012 guidelines, and focus on requirements verifiability, singularity, and fault injection methods.
Certified Automotive Software Testers should be able to demonstrate their skills in the following areas:
Introduction
The tester should be able to explain and give examples of the challenges of automotive product development that arise from divergent project objectives and increasing product complexity.
The tester should be able to recall project aspects that are influenced by standards such as time, cost, quality and project/product risks.
The tester should be able to recall the six generic phases in the system life cycle per ISO/IEC 24748-1
The tester should be able to recall the contribution and the collaboration of the tester in the release process.
ASPICE
The tester should be able to recall the two dimensions of Automotive SPICE® (ASPICE).
The tester should be able to explain the Capability levels 0 to 3 of ASPICE.
The tester should be able to explain the meaning of the 4 rating levels and the capability indicators of ASPICE from the test perspective.
The tester should be able to explain the requirements of ASPICE for the test strategy including the regression test strategy.
The tester should be able to recall the requirements of ASPICE for the test documentation.
The tester should be able to design a verification strategy (in contrast to a test strategy) and criteria for unit verification.
The tester should be able to explain the different traceability requirements of ASPICE from the test perspective.
ISO 26262
The tester should be able to explain the objective of functional safety for E/E systems.
The tester should be able to recall his contribution as a tester for the safety culture.
The tester should be able to recall his contribution as a tester for the safety culture.
The tester should be able to present the role of the tester in the framework of the safety life cycle per ISO 26262.
The tester should be able to recall the volumes (part titles) of ISO 26262 that are relevant for him.
The tester should be able to recall the criticality levels of ASIL.
The tester should be able to explain the influence of ASIL on applicable test design techniques and test types for static and dynamic tests and the resulting test extent.
The tester should be able to apply the selected method table of the ISO 26262.
AUTOSAR
The tester should be able to recall the objectives of AUTOSAR.
The tester should be able to recall the influences of AUTOSAR on the work of the tester.
Comparison
The tester should be able to recall the different objectives of ASPICE and ISO 26262.
The tester should be able to explain the differences between ASPICE, ISO 26262, and CTFL® regarding the test levels.
Test Environment in General
The tester should be able to recall the purpose/the motivation of a test environment in the automotive environment.
The tester should be able to recall the general parts of an automotive-specific test environment.
The tester should be able to recall the differences between Closed-Loop systems and Open-Loop systems.
The tester should be able to recall the essential functions, databases and protocols of an electronic control unit (ECU).
Testing in XiL environments
The tester should be able to recall the structure of a MiL test environment.
The tester should be able to explain the application area and the boundary conditions of a MiL test environment.
The tester should be able to reproduce the structure of a SiL test environment.
The tester should be able to recall the structure of an HiL test environment.
The tester should be able to explain the application areas and the boundary conditions of an HiL test environment.
The tester should be able to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the testing with the help of the criteria of the XiL test environments (MiL, SiL, and HiL).
The tester should be able to apply criteria for the assignment of a given test scope to one or more test environments.
The tester should be able to classify the three XiL test environments (MiL, SiL, HiL) in the V-model.
Static test techniques
The tester should be able to explain the purpose, types, and obligations of the MISRA C: 2012 programming guideline with the help of examples.
The tester should be able to apply a review of requirements with the quality characteristics of the ISO/IEC 29148 that are relevant for him.
Dynamic test techniques
The tester should be able to create test cases to achieve modified condition/decision testing coverage.
The tester should be able to explain the use of back-to-back testing by giving examples.
The tester should be able to explain the principle of fault injection tests by giving examples.
The tester should be able to recall the principles of requirement-based testing.
The tester should be able to apply context-dependent criteria for the choice of suitable and necessary test design techniques.