How To: Sub System Hazard Analysis with Mil-Std-882E
What you'll learn
- Recognize the Similarities and Differences between Sub System & System Hazard Analysis
- Understand Task 204's Purpose
- Understand Task 204's Description; Reporting & Contracting Requirements
- Apply the Commentary to Enhance Task 204's Value and Effectiveness
Requirements
- No prior experience needed, although you will benefit from understanding basic concepts of System Safety.
Description
Introduction
Hello, everyone, and welcome to the Safety Artisan, where you will find professional, pragmatic, and impartial instruction on all things system safety. I'm Simon – your host for today, as always and it's the fourth of April 22. With everything happening in the world, I hope this video finds you safe and well.
Sub-System Hazard Analysis
Let's move straight on to what we're going to be doing. We're going to be talking today about subsystem hazard analysis and this is task 204 under the military standard 882E. Previously we've done 201, which was preliminary hazard identification, 202, which is preliminary hazard analysis, and 203, which is safety requirements hazard analysis. And with task 204 and task 205, which is system has analysis, we're now getting stuck into particular systems that we're thinking about, whether physical or intangible. We’re thinking about the system under consideration and I'm getting into that analysis.
Topics for this Session
So, the topics that we're going to cover today, I've got a little preamble to set things in perspective. We then get into the three purposes of task 204. First, to verify compliance. Secondly, to identify new hazards. And thirdly, to recommend necessary actions. In fact, that would be recommended control measures for hazards and risks. We've got six slides of task description, a couple of slides on reporting, one on contracting, and then a few slides on some commentary where I put in my tuppence worth and I'll hopefully add some value to the basic bones of the standard. It's worth saying that you'll notice that subsystem is
highlighted in yellow and the reason for that is that the subsystem and system hazard analysis tasks are very, very similar. They're identical except for certain passages and I've highlighted those in yellow. Normally I use a yellow highlighter to emphasize something I want to talk about. This time around, I'm using underlining for that and the yellow is showing you what these are different for subsystem analysis as opposed to system analysis. And when you've watched both sessions on 204 and 205, I think you'll see the significance of why I've done that.
Who this course is for:
- Beginners in Hazard Analysis, Safety Risk Assessment, Designers, Managers.
Instructor
- 4.4 Instructor Rating
- 488 Reviews
- 6,351 Students
- 16 Courses
Hi, I'm Simon Di Nucci, and I have spent 25+ years as a system safety engineer. I have always sought to pass on my expertise to others.
I was part of the team that taught the official safety engineering courses to all UK Ministry of Defence staff. I then went on to create bespoke safety courses for several different clients, including the UK Military Aviation Authority. I'm now teaching safety online, to anyone who wants to do Safety, Just Right.
To do this, I have drawn on my wide and deep experience in safety consulting and engineering. Much of my career has been working for governments or consulting to the public sector on Australian, UK, US, and European programs.
I am a Fellow of Engineers Australia (FIE(Aust)) and on the National Engineering Register, so studying my courses will count for EA CPD. I have an MSc in Safety-Critical Systems Engineering.