
Explore hazard and operability study and layers of protection analysis to identify hazardous scenarios, quantify risk, and specify safety instrumented system requirements for major hazard installations.
Explore why process safety matters by examining barrier integrity, the bowtie model, independent protection layers, and inherently safer design, tied to major incidents and regulatory changes.
Navigate the regulatory landscape for process safety on major hazard installations, mapping COMAH, OSHA PSM, Seveso III directive, and IEC 61511 to guide hazard and operability studies and LOPA.
Explore the hazard identification toolkit, including hazop and lopa, with what-if, checklist, FMEA, fault tree, and event tree analyses linked to bowtie diagrams.
Explore how risk is defined, measured, and judged against tolerability criteria in major hazard installations. Learn how layers of protection analysis and safety integrity levels drive risk reduction.
Navigate the end-to-end hazop and lopa workflow, linking hazard identification through to functional safety assessment, using independent protection layers and IEC 61511 standards for auditable risk reduction.
Master the structure and preparation of a hazard and operability study, including team composition, node definitions, documentation, scheduling, and layers of protection analysis.
Understand how to define nodes with clear design intent to drive a hazard and operability study, using IEC 61882 boundaries and guide words for precise deviations.
Apply guide words to process parameters to generate deviations from design intent in HAZOP studies, and learn the seven standard guide words and their use.
Identify credible causes and trace escalation to end consequences using the bowtie model, document safeguards, and distinguish hazard and operability study safeguards from independent protection layers.
Explore a complete hazop worksheet for a three-phase gas separation vessel, detailing node boundary, design intent, deviations, safeguards, and auditable action records.
Master chazop, the control system hazop, and learn how control and safety logic deliver protection for major hazards through cause and effect charts, alarm management, and IEC 61511 verification.
Apply HAZOP to batch and procedural processes by analyzing each step—charging, holding, reacting, heating, cooling, discharging—under time-dependent design intent, addressing human factors, guide words, and safeguards.
Manage and close hazard and operability study actions by maintaining a living action register, prioritizing safety-critical findings, and providing verifiable close-out evidence aligned with project governance and regulatory expectations.
Explore how HAZOP identifies hazards and LOPA quantifies risk using bowtie diagrams, initiating event frequency, PFD, and safety integrity levels to determine tolerable risk and need for protection.
Analyze the LOPA accident scenario structure, linking one initiating event to a defined consequence through independent protection layers, ensuring auditable risk arithmetic and clear safety integrity level determination.
Identify initiating event frequency as the starting point of layers of protection analysis, then classify events into equipment failure, human error, external events, or process upset, using engineering judgment.
Establish consequence severity categories and tolerable frequency targets, then use layers of protection analysis to justify safety instrumented function allocations and their safety integrity levels.
Explore independent protection layers in layers of protection analysis, distinguishing qualifying barriers from safeguards, and learn how independence, functionality, and auditability determine probability of failure on demand credits.
Learn how to apply probability of failure on demand credits in layers of protection analysis, validate independent protection layers, and compute mitigated event frequency using CCPS and IEC 61511 benchmarks.
Apply the LOPA calculation to determine safety integrity level targets by linking initiating event frequency, independent protection layer credits, and tolerable risk targets, with a practical gas separator scenario.
Conduct a full layers of protection analysis at a natural gas compressor station. Credit independent protection layers and determine safety integrity level 2 for the safety instrumented system.
Explore limits and pitfalls of layers of protection analysis, including independence breaches, probability of failure on demand credits, and common cause and dependent failures, with data for credible risk assessment.
Translate layers of protection analysis results into a rigorous safety requirement specification, defining each safety instrumented function with set points, response times, and safe states for design, testing, and audit.
Learn how to verify safety integrity levels with PFD calculation methods in safety instrumented system design. Use data inputs, architecture considerations, and verification methods to ensure levels per IEC 61511.
Explore safety instrumented system architecture, featuring sensors, logic solvers, and final elements, and learn how redundancy, independence, and voting schemes balance probability of failure on demand and spurious trips.
Learn how proof testing, preventive maintenance, and bypass management keep safety instrumented systems effective through their life, including how test intervals and coverage affect safety integrity levels.
Govern the IEC 61511 life cycle with functional safety management, conduct independent safety assessments, and integrate hazop and lopa to meet safety integrity level targets.
Work through a complete HAZOP and LOPA to design a safety instrumented system achieving a safety integrity level 2, with a one-out-of-two sensor architecture and partial stroke testing.
Apply hazard and operability studies and layers of protection analysis to upstream oil and gas, justify high-integrity pressure protection systems, and navigate IEC 61511 and safety case regulations.
Apply hazop and lopa to gas compression and pipeline systems, identifying hazards, gaps in protection, and independent protection layers to manage surge, overpressure, and third-party risks.
Explore hazard and operability study and layers of protection analysis in chemical and petrochemical processing, focusing on reactor and fired heater safety, safety instrumented system trip functions, barriers, regulatory obligations.
Apply hazop and lopa to power generation and utilities, analyzing turbine overspeed, HRSG risks, and protection layer independence within IEC standards for process and machinery safety.
Lead hazard and operability studies with technical competence, facilitation, and process knowledge to ensure rigorous hazard identification, records, and alignment with IEC 61882, IEC 61511, and layers of protection analysis.
Prepare for functional safety exams by applying hazop, lopa, and sil concepts to realistic process scenarios, credit independent protection layers, and determine safety integrity levels from quantified risk gaps.
Consolidate hazard identification, risk governance, and end-to-end safety workflows from hazop through bowtie diagram integration and layers of protection analysis to functional safety lifecycle.
▸ Every major accident in the process industries shares one root cause: hazards that were known, and risks that were not adequately controlled.
Bhopal. Texas City. Piper Alpha. Buncefield. In each case, process hazard analysis tools existed that could have identified the failure modes before the event. HAZOP and LOPA exist precisely to prevent these outcomes — and in regulated industries, conducting them is not optional.
This course is the complete practical guide to HAZOP and LOPA for process, safety and C&I engineers.
▸ Why these two methods
HAZOP — Hazard and Operability Study — is the primary technique for identifying hazards in process plant design. It is required by IEC 61511 as part of the functional safety lifecycle, by OSHA PSM for covered processes in the United States, and by COMAH for major hazard sites in the UK. If you work on any process plant, pipeline or offshore installation, HAZOP is a professional requirement rather than a preference.
LOPA — Layers of Protection Analysis — is the semi-quantitative method that bridges HAZOP and SIL determination. It takes the scenarios a HAZOP identifies and quantifies whether existing safeguards provide sufficient risk reduction, or whether a Safety Instrumented System is required and at what SIL. It is the most widely used SIL determination method in the process industry globally, and the one most often challenged by competent authorities and independent verifiers.
▸ Two complete worked studies
A full HAZOP worksheet worked through a three-phase gas separator, and a LOPA taking a compressor station high-pressure scenario from HAZOP finding through to SIL 2 assignment — with every number shown and justified. These are examples you can hold up next to your own study.
▸ Course structure — 36 lectures across 6 sections
Foundations of Hazard Identification & Process Safety — why process safety matters, the regulatory and standards landscape, the hazard identification toolkit, risk concepts and tolerability, and the end-to-end HAZOP and LOPA workflow
HAZOP Methodology — Principles & Practice — study structure and preparation, nodes and design intent, guide words and deviations, causes, consequences and safeguards, a worked gas separation example, CHAZOP for control systems, procedural HAZOP for batch processes, and managing actions to close-out
LOPA — Layers of Protection Analysis — the accident scenario, initiating event frequency, consequence severity and risk targets, independent protection layer criteria and PFD credit values, the full calculation and SIL determination, a complete worked study, and the limitations and common errors
SIL Determination & SIS Design Fundamentals — from LOPA to the Safety Requirements Specification, PFD calculation methods, SIS architecture, proof testing and bypass management, functional safety management and the FSA, and a worked example from SIL assignment through to SIS design
Applied HAZOP & LOPA — case studies in upstream oil and gas, gas compression and pipelines, chemical and petrochemical processing, and power generation, plus HAZOP leader facilitation and competence
Course Exams — two full mock examinations
▸ Where the numbers come from
Initiating event frequencies drawn from CCPS, OREDA and ISA TR84.00.02. IPL credit values for BPCS loops, operator response, pressure safety valves and independent trips — with the test for whether each safeguard actually qualifies as an IPL. This is the part most often challenged in review, and the part most training leaves vague.
▸ Certification relevance
HAZOP and LOPA methodology is directly examined in the TÜV Functional Safety Engineer (IEC 61511), TÜV SIS Engineer and CFSP certifications. A dedicated exam preparation lecture covers the key concepts and the questions most commonly asked.
▸ What you get
Nearly 7 hours of structured video across 36 lectures and six sections
Two full mock examinations — timed, scored and retakeable
Two complete worked studies, HAZOP and LOPA, with every number justified
Applied case studies across four industry sectors
Lifetime access, mobile and TV access, and a certificate of completion
Udemy's 30-day money-back guarantee
▸ Built by a practitioner
Taught by a practising engineer with over fifteen years delivering safety-critical control system projects across oil, gas and energy infrastructure — including live HAZOP and LOPA studies, SIL determinations, Safety Requirements Specifications and Functional Safety Assessments on active major hazard installations. The methodology is explained as it is applied, not as abstraction.
▸ No prior HAZOP or LOPA experience is required — the course builds from first principles through to applied methodology and worked calculations. No software needed: HAZOP and LOPA are documented in structured worksheets, and the course focuses on methodology rather than tool selection.
If you are a process, safety or C&I engineer, or a project manager working on any plant containing hazardous substances or energy, this course gives you the methodology, the worked examples and the reference material to contribute to studies, lead them, and review their outputs.
Enrol now and walk into your next study able to contribute, lead or challenge it.