
Apply ballpark estimation to a numeric compound expression with combined operations, quickly discarding unlikely choices and predicting the answer is greater than three.
Analyze how negative decimals behave under even and odd exponents in GMAT number theory, using x = -0.256 and a sample -1/2 to compare x^3, x^4, and x^-5.
Evaluate sufficiency: a factor of seven forces Q to be seven, prime, so statement 1 is sufficient; 42 factor can be prime or not, so statement 2 is not sufficient.
Learn to simplify sums and differences of powers by factoring the smallest power, canceling exponents, and using plausible approximations to estimate results instead of exact values.
handles integer parity in data sufficiency by treating x/2 as integer or fraction, showing statement 1 is not sufficient; statement 2, with an odd exponent, makes x even and sufficient.
Plug in the simplest values satisfying P/4 = Q with Q prime >3, such as Q = 7 and P = 28, then count divisors to identify evens.
Evaluate data sufficiency for GMAT number theory with integers, watch for negative values in AB relationships like AB = A or AB = 1, and combine statements to assess sufficiency.
In this GMAT number theory problem, factor the smallest power 2^(x-6) from the expression, use 2^6−1=63 to cancel, and equate exponents to get x=12.
Apply parity rules: a product is odd only when both factors are odd; a sum is odd when terms have opposite parity. Therefore x*y is even; statement is not sufficient.
Apply negative exponent properties to rewrite the expression as inverses of numbers, simplify to powers of three, and equate exponents to solve for m equals two.
Apply the quotient approach to factor and multiple questions, determining when x is a multiple of y by treating x/y as an integer and evaluating two statements for sufficiency.
Represent a three-digit number as A B C to study place values and rounding; apply rules for N, 10N, 100N, and combine statements to deduce the tens digit B.
Calculate the minimum n as the least common multiple of 2445 and 700, 12,600, and note that 72 divides n while it exceeds 12,000 for multiples and 27 does not.
Rationalize to untangle an expression with combined roots and radicals by using the conjugate, cancel radical terms, and simplify to a clean result of 4.
Use the divisor-counting formula for X = 2^1 3^2 5^1 to get 12 factors; removing one leaves 11 factors greater than one.
Apply a clean reformulation by identifying the minimum x from each statement and using the least common multiple to combine them, revealing that x must be a multiple of 200.
There is one topic prevailing among the GMAT Quantitative questions with an almost 25% frequency of occurrence in the whole section: Number Theory. It's time for you to realize that a solid foundation for GMAT Prepping must be based on the reassurance that Number Theory is a learning must, and that your chances of reaching a good score can only improve if you decide to get serious about Number Theory.
My previous course provided an introduction to Number Theory. Now it's time to move from Theory to Practice. In this course I will prove how the concepts discussed in my previous course:
+constitute the core of your Arithmetic knowledge needed for acing the GMAT Quant section.
+appear repeatedly in the most basic Number-Theory-related GMAT questions.
+require careful crafting and logic ellaboration at the time of tackling Quant questions of a higher level of difficulty.
Learning to solve GMAT Quant questions based on Number Theory requires undergoing two stages of Modeling and Mimicking. Modeling here refers to the fact you need good sample materials, theory and solutions to learn from. This has been my objective when assembling a collection of video solutions for the most typical questions you will find in the Quant section regarding Number Theory. Mimicking implies your own work, which involves watching the solutions carefully over and over in order to reach two targets:
- understanding how the theory presented and developed in my previous course on Number Theory can be used to tackle the simplest questions.
- memorizing the optimal sequence of logical steps used to approach the solution for each typical question presented.
Working the videos in this way will guarantee a maximum satisfaction at the time of tackling new questions yourself because:
- you will recognize the patterned questions
- you will recall the solutions in your mind and attempt to tackles the questions likewise.