Udemy
Turn what you know into an opportunity and reach millions around the world.
Learn More
Your cart is empty.
Keep shopping
FIDIC DAB to DAAB: The Dispute Path 1999 vs 2017
New
Rating: 4.8 out of 5(2 ratings)
210 students

FIDIC DAB to DAAB: The Dispute Path 1999 vs 2017

Engineer's determination, NODs, board referral, decision, arbitration under Red, Yellow and Silver Books 1999 and 2017
Created byPMC Edge
Last updated 10/2026
English
ArabicEnglish

What you'll learn

  • Distinguish a claim from a Dispute under Red Book 1999 and 2017, including the 2022 reprint definition
  • Apply the Engineer's determination procedure and time limits under 1999 Sub-Clause 3.5 and 2017 Sub-Clause 3.7
  • Give a valid Notice of Dissatisfaction and meet the 2017 42-day DAAB referral window
  • Form a DAB or DAAB and handle failure to appoint, including the 2022 appointing official
  • Refer a Dispute correctly and act on the board's decision, payment effect and corrections
  • Use amicable settlement, arbitration, enforcement and 2017 dispute avoidance to manage a dispute end to end
  • Compare how the board is appointed under the Red, Yellow and Silver Books, 1999 (Sub-Clause 20.2) and 2017 (Sub-Clause 21.1)

Course content

4 sections • 13 lectures • 42m total length
  • Course Introduction2:08

    What the course covers, the three texts we compare (1999, 2017 original, 2017 2022 reprint), and how to use the resources.

  • Claim or Dispute?3:36

    When a disagreement becomes a Dispute: 1999 Sub-Clause 20.4 versus the 2017 definition in 1.1.29, original and 2022 reprint.

  • The Engineer's Determination3:47

    The Engineer's role: 1999 Sub-Clause 3.5 and 20.1 versus 2017 Sub-Clause 3.7 consultation, determination, time limits and corrections.

  • NOD on the Engineer's Determination3:47

    The 2017 Notice of Dissatisfaction with the Engineer's Determination: content, 28-day limit, partial NODs and the 42-day referral window.

Requirements

  • Basic familiarity with construction contracts or FIDIC terminology is helpful
  • No legal qualification needed
  • Access to your own FIDIC Red Book (1999 or 2017) is recommended but not required

Description

This course contains the use of artificial intelligence.

A claim has been rejected. What happens next is not a matter of opinion: it is a path with fixed steps and fixed clocks. Take a step late, or in the wrong order, and you can lose the right to challenge at all.

This course walks the whole dispute path under the FIDIC Red Book 1999 (Dispute Adjudication Board) and the Red Book 2017 (Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board), side by side, and flags where FIDIC's 2022 reprint of the 2017 text changes the wording. The course follows the Red Book 1999 and 2017, and includes a comparison of how the board is appointed under the Red, Yellow and Silver Books.

What you will be able to do:

  • Tell a claim from a Dispute under each edition and print

  • Follow the Engineer's determination under 1999 Sub-Clause 3.5 and 2017 Sub-Clause 3.7, including time limits and deemed rejection

  • Give a complete Notice of Dissatisfaction on time, and refer within the 2017 42-day window

  • Form the board, refer a Dispute correctly, and act on the decision and its payment effect

  • Use amicable settlement, start arbitration on time, and enforce decisions

  • Use the 2017 DAAB to avoid disputes, not just decide them

Why this course is different:

  • Built around one dispute path, from the Engineer's determination to arbitration, rather than a book-by-book read-through

  • 1999 and 2017 compared step by step, with the 2022 reprint changes flagged where they matter

  • Worked dates on a fictional project, with pause-and-decide exercises in every lecture

  • A downloadable Quick Reference timeline for both editions

  • Short: about 43 minutes of focused video

This course is independent practical training. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by FIDIC, and it is not legal advice. Always read your own Contract and Particular Conditions.


Who this course is for:

  • Contract, claims and commercial managers on FIDIC projects
  • Engineers and Employer's representatives who administer determinations
  • Contractors' project managers who need to protect dispute rights
  • Lawyers and FCCM candidates wanting a practical map of Clause 20 (1999) and Clause 21 (2017)