
Learn cycles of learning and kaizen to observe, document best practices, and standardize processes, then ratchet gains to sustain a stable, repeatable work system with predictable outcomes.
cultivate mindful leadership by shifting from mindless, rigid mindsets to flexible, open, and accountable practices that drive continual improvement and agile organizations.
Develop self-aware leadership by cultivating an open, mindful mindset, embracing continuous improvement, and driving end-to-end process enhancements through standard work, team collaboration, and accountability.
Develop a strategic mindset by embracing mindful thinking, recognizing multiple worldviews, asking questions, and balancing routine, improvement, and strategic work across front-line, middle, and senior management to guide future goals.
Assess your motivation with a self-assessment that splits time among strategy, improvement, and routine work. Evaluate value to customers and stakeholders, and consider who drives strategy if leaders don't.
Assess your motivation by reflecting on what to do less and do more at work, focusing on what you can control and how you might change yourself rather than others.
Engage with a supplemental reading to drive improvement by practicing reflective management. Build self-reflection into your work processes and discuss the ideas in your management group.
Develop organizational learning across three Gemba levels by applying single, double, and triple loop learning, guided by situational awareness and cycles of learning.
Explains the first learning loop in Gemba one, emphasizing standard work, right priorities, and collaborative improvement through observation, testing, reflection, and updating standards to raise quality.
Assess how well your management team learns together by scoring three questions on understanding work standards, seeking improvements, and onboarding, then discuss lessons learned to drive process improvements.
Map suppliers inputs, cross-functional work processes, and end-to-end systems to deliver customer outputs; measure variation, reduce waste, and use the five M's (map, measure, mine, modify, maintain) to improve performance.
Assess how well you know your work by mapping macro processes and value streams that deliver external value to customers, identifying suppliers, and expanding into high-level micro processes.
Embrace humility and lifelong learning by recognizing that we don’t understand everything, invite others to teach us, and move forward with cautious, committed guidance.
Identify the targeted customer by their point of view and voice of the customer. Structure requirements with value proposition and evidence-based testing to verify performance.
Embrace each day as new, continually asking why and pursuing wiser answers. Prosperity arises from open-minded inquiry, the five whys, and reflecting on the if-then decisions behind actions.
Explore the mutually exclusive, completely exhaustive framework for performance objectives and build a predictive analytics system through a clear measurement structure, with cultural surveys and management conversations.
Combine system one and system two thinking to support fast, informed decisions with prior analysis. Profaned knowledge drives legacy losses through surface reasoning and waste like mouri, mora, and muda.
Shift from legacy thinking to continuous experimentation and innovation, embracing profound knowledge—four elements: systems, variation, theory of knowledge, and psychology—to guide evidence-based, process-driven improvement.
Leaders synchronize gemba one and gemba two by standardizing work, measuring flow, and pursuing pdca improvements to reduce waste, balance throughput, and make the desired process visible.
Navigate learning loops from standardized work to strategic optimization, moving through standardization, improvement, and transformation projects. Gemba three guides leaders to align environment, decision rights, and measures toward profitable growth.
Define your own quality definition and operationalize it across product, service, or process areas, aligning with the value proposition and leadership to ensure customer quality and reliability.
Dispersion indicates the degree of consistency around central tendency by measuring how data spread around the mean using sum of squares, variance, and standard deviation, with degrees of freedom.
Use a process behavior chart and Friday's data probability plot to identify unusual call patterns, root causes, and improvement targets for service performance.
interpret variation using distributions and probability to link mean shifts and variation reduction, improving process performance and managing risk in unpredictable data.
Assess your data proficiency and measurement system; differentiate special vs common causes, and identify what Bob and what wow mean for each measure to improve KPI use.
Explore six data analysis methods for dirty data, using original time-series and charts like probability plots, CPK, parado chart, and Yamagami to reveal process performance and improvement opportunities.
Probability plots reveal how data spread over time, showing one group is highly consistent while another is more variable; overlapping red and black distributions highlight a divergence in performance.
Anova identifies how much variation in productivity is explained by subgroups and events, revealing confounded day and night shift groups and showing about forty-seven percent improvement potential when addressed.
Interpret data distribution using capability studies and probability plots to expose misaligned specifications, then apply lean, standard work improvements to reduce warehouse wait times and accelerate loading.
Establish a systematic way of working using statistics, embracing variation, and applying exploratory data analysis, statistical storytelling, and data visualization to guide problem statements.
Build a comprehensive quality system by aligning kaizen, breakthrough, and transformation projects across gemba levels, tying KPIs to strategy and cultivating customer-oriented, collaborative quality managers.
Define the role of a process owner who designs end-to-end workflows, aligns resources, removes barriers, enables cross-functional participation, and ensures measurement integrity to drive sustained customer value.
Confront the problem by selecting the issue, defining the goal, and measuring the gap between results and targets through exploratory data analysis, capability analysis, and performance measures.
Develop a clear problem statement by defining current versus desired states, measuring the gap and scope, and setting location, measures, and a customer‑perceived productivity goal.
Cycle learning to simplify processes, reduce fear of change, and document workflows, then measure, eliminate waste and variation, standardize, and apply lean thinking before automation for continuous improvement.
Apply a chi-square test to quantify the gap between observed and expected performance, showing 52 failures in 250 units versus about 0.68 expected failures.
Select project types by assessing the cause and solution, using daily management, Kaizen, Six Sigma, breakthrough, and transformation projects; the Compaq turnaround shows how urgent, focused transformation can double revenue.
Choose an improvement methodology that fits your culture: a detailed scientific investigation with formal rollout or a team-based inquiry with process owners and shared practices.
Explore the shift from functional silos and vertical control to process-based collaboration and inter-group integration to enhance continual improvement proficiency for leaders.
Assess your organization's capacity to improve by taking a seven-question survey on daily work improvements, performance measures, resources, targets, development, coaching, and alignment with company objectives to build consensus.
Explore how cooperation in organizations becomes mutually beneficial to achieve shared objectives, through management that fosters compassion, gentleness of spirit, and the full potential of each person.
Assess your approach to strategy as a process, combining structured brainstorming with a management loop to assess at start, conduct strategy search, and formulate change projects that build future capabilities.
Assess your strategy process and annual planning by mapping who does what when and how you judge the plan. Consider cycles of learning and improvements to project level planning.
Develop a clear communication plan that defines internal communications, media use, messages, audiences, and frequency, with executive ownership and regular management reviews to drive continual improvement.
Clarify an improvement project through communication planning, craft the initial kickoff message, and build team cohesion with formal and informal methods while keeping the organization informed about milestones.
Initiate change management projects and build engagement momentum across cross-functional networks. Align end-to-end system structures with standard routines and cycles of improvement to predict a better future state.
Define standard work as the efficient method to deliver quality on schedule within budget. Build credible, usable, accessible, and consistent work instructions by sequencing tasks, checklists, training, tools, and targets.
Improve standard work by applying kaizen cycles and incremental projects to reach higher process capability while identifying bottlenecks and constraints. Link value streams, reduce waste, and optimize flow.
Learn to manage improvement projects by creating lightweight charters, prioritizing a portfolio of value-adding initiatives, and aligning resources, roles, and milestones to eliminate waste and monitor progress.
Are you a business leader? Do you have responsibility for a broad part of your organization? Is quality important to you? Sure, delivering quality in the products or services that are delivered to customers is important, but that can be delegated! Are you sure that the total responsibility for quality should be in fact borne by the operational part of your organization? What about responsibility for the quality of the current business, its financial performance, its contribution to society, or its ability to sustain its future performance? Can these responsibilities for quality be delegated to the operational component in your organization?
Have you ever sat in a quality training program (whether it be Total Quality Management, Lean training, or Lean Six Sigma training) and wondered how learning about Fishbone diagrams, Pareto charts, control statistics, etc. can make you a better leader? Are these the tools of leadership or is there something that is missing?
If you are frustrated by what you have been through it is most likely because you have not found a guide who can take you on this journey. That is the purpose of this training. To enable management teams to become the quality leaders that they need to be to manage a successful business.
The first step in this process is to become proficient in the basic aspects of quality as it applies to the job of the executive function. That is the purpose of this first program. It was designed by Dr. Gregory H. Watson, one of today’s thought leaders in quality who has focused on developing programs that enable executives to create quality as a competitive difference in their organizations. His 1994 book, Strategic Benchmarking, opened management’s vision to a different way of learning about how to manage their organizations. After then, Dr. Watson has been engaged in a private consulting practice dedicated to helping executives and their companies learn how to manage quality in a more comprehensive way.
His retirement from this active consultancy has led to a unique opportunity to package his experiences and lessons learned into a series of executive-directed quality engagements. Each module in this basic proficiency training consist of lectures that are punctuated with workshop activities for the leaders of an organization to perform. Step-by-step, a logical progression expands business leader thinking from a myopic understanding of quality as applying merely to products or service activity of operations, but also to come to understand and exercise their own responsibility for developing the system that will establish quality as a discipline that leads to cultural differentiation, which is a sustainable competitive advantage.