
Compare two consulting fees by asking what decision each engagement enables. Write the committee’s decision, identify what the client can deliver internally, and use the worksheet to estimate annual labor value and direct delivery costs at 100 and 120 hours.
Turn a value discovery conversation into an approval decision with a named owner and deadline. Estimate the current baseline and possible improvement, then use the worksheet to name the source and verification owner for each estimate.
Compare three engagement options at the week-six decision point. Identify when the committee could see results, what the client would receive and own under each option, and which option gives the committee enough evidence to act.
Define an observable acceptance test for the North handoff map. Use the worksheet to assign responsibility for providing the sample and decide what work or pricing decisions should change if only twelve of twenty records are available.
Draft a one-page proposal with an opening decision the committee can act on at week six. Calculate baseline and midpoint capacity, then recalculate the value at fifteen and twenty-five minutes per repeat to show how the assumption affects your case.
Calculate direct cost, contribution, and contribution percentage for a fixed-fee engagement. Add twelve analyst hours and eight consultant hours, then use the worksheet to explain how the extra work changes the economics.
Define an access trigger and specify which work can continue if it is missed. Use the worksheet to design a practical check for inconsistent coding and decide what action the team should take if the check fails.
Run a progress review that ends with an actionable decision. Determine what the committee can approve, name the claim affected by missing records, and draft a Friday decision request the sponsor can use.
Price an engagement with scarce specialist time. Separate work required before the board meeting from work that follows approval, then calculate direct cost and contribution for the broad offer, the diagnostic, and a later stage.
Design a staged consulting offer the board can authorize. Write the decision and a measurable acceptance test, then use the workshop worksheet to explain what each stage costs and which conditions must be met before it starts.
This course contains the use of artificial intelligence.
The client asks why your fee is higher. Can you explain what they’re paying for?
When the scope, delivery risk, or expected outcome is still fuzzy, a number alone leaves both sides guessing. I designed this course to help you work through the economics of an engagement and write a fee proposal that makes sense to the buyer and to the team doing the work.
What you’ll build
A way to connect the fee to a specific client outcome and document the assumptions behind it.
A cost and capacity estimate that includes work the delivery team will actually have to do.
Pricing options that make scope, risk, and commitments visible to the client.
A fee recommendation you can explain when the sponsor asks about uncertainty, alternatives, or a smaller pilot.
Who I designed this for
This course is for independent consultants, agency owners, engagement leads, and professional services teams preparing or reviewing proposals. Bring one real opportunity you’re pricing or use the cases to practice before the next fee conversation.
How you’ll practice
I’m Dr. Law Payne. I drew on my graduate training in business to design pricing worksheets and worked examples that help you check the math and explain the logic in plain language. You’ll practice setting a fee and showing what the client gets at that level of commitment.
Enroll with one engagement you need to price. Leave with a fee proposal you can defend and a clear explanation of its value.