Udemy
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
    •  
Turn what you know into an opportunity and reach millions around the world.
Learn More
Your cart is empty.
Keep shopping
Delay Analysis Methods & Concurrent Delay Approaches-Basic
Rating: 4.4 out of 5(19 ratings)
80 students

Delay Analysis Methods & Concurrent Delay Approaches-Basic

Delay Analysis Methods' strengths & Weaknesses,TIA&WA, Concurrent Delays' Approaches & Recommended Contract Clauses
Created byGhosoun Hashem
Last updated 7/2025
English

What you'll learn

  • Delay Analysis Definition, Categories, Causes, Strengths and Weaknesses, methods to apply and required data for each method
  • Delay Analysis Techniques (as-planned Vs. as-built, updated as-planned Vs. updated as-built, as-planned impacted, time impact analysis, collapsed as-built)
  • Concurrent Delay Definition, Complexity and referred Contractual Provision
  • Different Approaches of Concurrent Delay (Dominant Cause, The Malmaison Approach, Apportionment and The Devlin Approach)
  • The Bespoke agreed Contract Terms & Conditions for Concurrent Delays and its cost & time entitlements.

Course content

6 sections22 lectures1h 55m total length
  • Introduction5:54

Requirements

  • No previous experience is needed.

Description

This course explores all issues about construction delays, its definitions, causes and impact, associated ramifications. Concurrent Delays are considered as one of the law problematical areas and most complicated & controversial kind of delay disputes. This is due to its unique/complex nature and the fact that there is no one standard and agreed coherent definition or interpretation of concurrent delay. We herein proposed various options for definition of concurrent delays, which its selection depends on how both parties agreed to deal with concurrency, along with proposed contractual bespoke agreed Clauses/ Provisions to reflect the contractor entitlement. Also application of detailed CPM delay analysis and application of Dominant Cause if applicable, “time-but-no-money” approach or Apportionment (preferably Apportionment of Time). And, further recommended the establishment of a UAE dedicated Technology and Construction Court Division that will definitely allow for more efficient resolution of construction industry complex disputes. Plus identifying and analyzing the basis and rules governing the determination of EOT in cases of concurrency under various civil and common law jurisdictions along with court’s relevant approach. It is concluded that Civil Law countries (such as USA, Scotland, Canada and Australia) preferred approach for concurrency is Apportionment. I guarantee it's such an interesting journey, I Hope you enjoy it.

Who this course is for:

  • Planners, Contracts Administrators, Claims Engineers and Projects Control Engineers.