
Assess computerized systems for GXP compliance using 11 keys to classify as GXP or non-GXP. Align validation with EU GMP annex 11 and 21 CFR part 11.
Perform risk-based vendor evaluation for cGXP computerised systems per gamp5, using postal assessments and onsite audits to assess novelty, complexity, and data integrity, ensuring validated systems and supplier good practices.
Develop a compliant validation master plan (VMP) aligned with EU-GMP and FDA guidance, detailing seven key elements, vendor document evaluation, and concurrent validation strategies.
Explore quality risk management for computerized systems under GAMP5 to ensure risk-based validation, data integrity, and patient safety across the CSV life cycle.
Develop inspection readiness for gamp5 guideline cgxp computerized systems by compiling a complete system inventory, robust validation documentation, change control, training records, and data protection and access controls.
Learn how to build a robust business continuity plan for cGXP computerized systems, covering event detection, impact evaluation, repair operations, deployment, recovery, and return to normal operations.
Explore computerized system validation under the GAMP 5 framework, including URS and FRS, IQ, OQ, PQ, risk assessment, and compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 and EU GMP Annex 11.
Many people think that the computerized system validation is nothing but just preparation of IQ, OQ, and PQ. But this is just an incomplete way of computerized system validation. So, we have made some sections in this guide that will discuss their requirements and also make the learner or participant aware of how to do complete validation.
This course contains a total of 6 sections and 7 lectures. If you have any question/s, you can put your question/s in the comments section. I will clarify your questions.
The first section includes information about Common errors related to computerized systems. This short recording will help you understand how many professionals make errors.
The second section includes information about the cGXP Assessment of the computerized systems. This is missing in most of the computerized systems validation approaches. First, the computerized systems should be evaluated whether it is having a cGXP impact or not. Based on that further validation study and depth of validation should be decided. The training session includes below points;
Importance of topic
Know your Trainer
Role of cGXP Assessment in Pharmaceuticals
Regulatory Expectations
FDA Citations
11 Keys for cGXP Assessment
Common Errors
Take Away from the session
Q&A
The third section includes information about Vendor evaluation of cGXP computerized systems. Many pharmaceuticals only evaluate the vendors for input materials used for manufacturing the drugs and drug products. But, the cGXP computerized systems vendors also should be evaluated. This session includes;
Guideline Requirements – EU, FDA, GAMP
Vendor Evaluation Process
Risk-based Decision Making
Postal Assessment – Points to consider, when postal assessment is suitable, key points to consider during postal assessment.
Onsite Audit Assessment – Supplier Good Practices
Q&A
The fourth section includes information about the validation master plan (VMP) and also Quality Risk Management of cGXP computerized systems. This section will focus on how to prepare VMP in line with the guidelines and how to perform the QRM.
The VMP lecture includes;
Guideline Requirements – EU, FDA
Validation Guidance by FDA
7 Key Elements of VMP
VMP elements discussion in detail
Common Errors
Q&A
The lecture on Quality Risk Management includes below points;
Purpose and Scope of CSV
QRM - Guideline Requirements in Computerised Systems
Quality Risk Management – Overview
Quality Risk Management - Practical Approach
Risk Management to Evaluate Potential Impact
Risk Management within the Validation Lifecycle
Q&A
The fifth section includes information explaining how the organization should be ready for inspections.
The last section which is section six explains the business continuity and disaster recovery plan. Without this plan, the computerized system validation will not have any meaning.
These all are the prerequisites for computerized system validation.