
In this video, we will study: “What is academic writing?” and explore “What is not academic writing?” We will also discuss a few characteristics that define all types of academic writing. Let’s go through these briefly.
What is Academic Writing?
Academic writing is a formal style of writing used in educational and scholarly contexts. It is used to communicate research, ideas, and arguments clearly and logically. Academic writing is usually objective, precise, and evidence-based.
Key Characteristics:
Cohesive and Clear: Academic writing is known for its clarity and cohesion. Ideas are presented in a structured manner, ensuring that the reader can follow the argument easily.
Example: A research paper on climate change will present facts, followed by analysis, and then a conclusion that ties back to the main argument or thesis. Each paragraph supports the overarching point being made.
Thesis Statement: Every piece of academic writing revolves around a thesis statement, which is the main argument or claim of the paper. This thesis serves as the foundation for the entire piece of writing, and each paragraph or section supports it.
Example: In an essay about the effects of social media on mental health, the thesis might be: “Social media has a negative impact on the mental health of teenagers.” Every paragraph in the essay will present evidence or reasoning to support this thesis.
Logical Structure: Academic writing follows a clear, logical structure that helps organize ideas and arguments. Typically, it consists of an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph contributes to the development of the thesis.
Example: In a research paper, the introduction sets up the problem, the body paragraphs present evidence and analysis, and the conclusion summarizes the findings and reinforces the thesis.
What is Not Academic Writing?
Non-academic writing typically lacks the formal tone, structured arguments, and evidence-based approach found in academic writing. It can be more casual, subjective, or conversational, and it often does not follow a strict logical framework.
Examples of Non-Academic Writing:
Personal Blogs: Blogs are often written in a conversational style and may include personal opinions or experiences without the backing of research or evidence.
Example: A blog post on “My Favorite Movies” might discuss personal preferences, but it won’t be structured with evidence, citations, or a thesis statement.
Creative Writing: Creative writing, such as fiction or poetry, prioritizes storytelling and emotional expression over logic or evidence. The writing style can be informal, with a focus on personal creativity rather than academic structure.
Example: A short story about a family vacation may be creative, imaginative, and emotional, but it doesn’t need to support a thesis or follow a logical, evidence-based structure.
Casual Emails or Texts: Informal communication like emails, texts, or social media posts generally does not adhere to the formal conventions of academic writing.
Example: An email to a friend about what you did over the weekend will be informal, personal, and likely won’t have a clear thesis or structured argument.
Conclusion
In this video, we've discussed what academic writing is and contrasted it with non-academic writing. Academic writing is characterized by its clarity, cohesive structure, and support for a central thesis. It follows a logical framework to ensure the reader can follow the argument or analysis. Understanding these core elements will help you create strong, effective academic papers.
In this video, we will study "Four Cs of Academic Writing," and how you can use them as a checklist to ensure better academic communication.
Introduction to the Four Cs: In the previous video, we learned that academic writing is characterized by being clear, concise, structured, and supported with facts and evidence. But while these characteristics are essential, there is another critical aspect of academic writing that helps ensure your writing is effective. This is where the Four Cs of Academic Writing come into play.
The Four Cs are:
Clarity
Conciseness
Coherence
Credibility
These principles are vital for academic communication and can be used as a checklist when reviewing your work. By ensuring your writing adheres to these principles, you can communicate your ideas effectively, making your academic work more impactful.
1. Clarity
Definition: Clarity in academic writing means that your ideas are expressed in a way that your audience can easily understand. It involves using precise language, avoiding ambiguity, and ensuring your sentences are well-structured.
How to achieve clarity:
Use specific terminology: Rather than saying "things are important," specify what those things are and why they matter.
Avoid jargon unless necessary: If you must use technical terms, make sure to explain them clearly.
Be direct and straightforward in your writing.
Example:
Unclear: "The research reveals that a number of factors are important when it comes to understanding the behavior."
Clear: "The research shows that environmental, social, and psychological factors are critical to understanding human behavior."
2. Conciseness
Definition: Conciseness means using the fewest words necessary to convey your message. Avoid wordiness and unnecessary repetition. This ensures that your argument is not lost in overly long sentences or superfluous details.
How to achieve conciseness:
Eliminate redundant words or phrases.
Avoid filler words such as "very," "really," or "just," unless they are essential for emphasis.
Focus on the main point and remove any tangential information that doesn’t directly support your argument.
Example:
Wordy: "Due to the fact that the experiment was conducted under very controlled conditions, the results can be considered as highly reliable."
Concise: "Because the experiment was conducted under controlled conditions, the results are highly reliable."
3. Coherence
Definition: Coherence in academic writing means that your ideas are logically connected and flow smoothly from one to the next. Each paragraph should contribute to the overall argument, and transitions should guide the reader through your writing seamlessly.
How to achieve coherence:
Use clear topic sentences to introduce each paragraph’s main point.
Ensure that each paragraph is unified around a single idea.
Use transitions and linking words (e.g., "therefore," "consequently," "in addition") to create a logical flow between ideas.
Example:
Non-coherent: "The climate is changing rapidly. The government should take immediate steps to address the issue. In conclusion, we must act now."
Coherent: "The climate is changing rapidly, and this has significant implications for the environment and society. To address this challenge, the government must implement policies that reduce carbon emissions. Therefore, immediate action is necessary to prevent further damage."
4. Credibility
Definition: Credibility refers to the trustworthiness of your writing. This means supporting your arguments with reliable sources, presenting evidence fairly, and ensuring that your work is free from errors. It also involves demonstrating expertise on the subject matter.
How to achieve credibility:
Cite reputable sources to back up your claims and arguments.
Use data, research findings, and evidence to support your statements.
Avoid plagiarism by properly referencing the sources of your ideas.
Ensure your writing is free from grammatical or factual errors.
Example:
Non-credible: "Many researchers believe that climate change is a serious issue, and the government should take action."
Credible: "According to Smith et al. (2022), climate change poses a significant threat to global biodiversity, and government action is necessary to mitigate its effects."
Using the Four Cs as a Checklist
Now that we’ve covered the Four Cs—Clarity, Conciseness, Coherence, and Credibility—let’s take a moment to discuss how you can use them as a checklist when reviewing your own academic writing.
Check for clarity: After writing, ask yourself: Is this easy to understand? Have I explained any complex terms or concepts? Would someone unfamiliar with this topic grasp my meaning?
Check for conciseness: Look for unnecessary words or phrases. Have I used the fewest words necessary to convey my ideas clearly? Have I avoided repetition and extraneous information?
Check for coherence: Read through your work to ensure there’s a logical progression of ideas. Do the paragraphs flow naturally from one to the next? Are the transitions clear and do they guide the reader effectively?
Check for credibility: Make sure you’ve supported your arguments with credible sources and solid evidence. Have you properly cited these sources? Is your writing free of errors?
Conclusion
By applying the Four Cs of Academic Writing—Clarity, Conciseness, Coherence, and Credibility—you ensure that your academic writing is not only effective but also of high quality. Always review your work with these principles in mind, and use them as a checklist before submission.
These Four Cs will help you refine your academic writing skills and ensure that your communication is clear, precise, and trustworthy, which is essential for academic success.
Final Note: Remember, mastering academic writing takes time and practice. By consistently applying the Four Cs, you’ll gradually improve your ability to convey complex ideas effectively and efficiently. Happy writing!
In this video, we will discuss the linguistic issues in academic writing. We will cover important aspects such as choosing active voice over passive voice, avoiding biased language, maintaining parallelism, and more. By addressing these linguistic issues, you can improve the clarity, fairness, and overall quality of your academic writing.
1. Active Voice vs. Passive Voice
Overview: One common linguistic issue in academic writing is the use of active versus passive voice. While passive voice is sometimes necessary, using active voice can make your writing more direct, engaging, and easier to understand. Active voice tends to make sentences clearer and more concise, as it emphasizes the subject performing the action.
Active Voice: In the active voice, the subject of the sentence performs the action.
Example: "The researcher conducted the experiment."
Why active voice?: This construction makes it clear who is performing the action and directly ties the subject (the researcher) to the verb (conducted).
Passive Voice: In passive voice, the subject receives the action, and the doer of the action may be omitted.
Example: "The experiment was conducted by the researcher."
Why avoid passive voice?: This structure is more indirect, and in many cases, it can make sentences feel more cumbersome and unclear, especially if the agent (researcher) is left out entirely.
When to use passive voice: Passive voice can be useful when the focus is on the action or the result, rather than the person performing the action. For instance, in scientific writing, the focus might be more on the experiment or results than on the researcher.
Example (Passive voice is acceptable): "The data were analyzed using statistical methods."
Why passive voice here?: The emphasis is on the data and the process, rather than the person analyzing it.
2. Avoiding Biased Language
Overview: Biased language refers to words or phrases that unfairly stereotype, marginalize, or make assumptions about people based on characteristics such as race, gender, age, disability, or other personal attributes. Using neutral, inclusive, and respectful language is a key principle in academic writing.
How to avoid biased language:
Use gender-neutral terms: Avoid using gender-specific terms when they are unnecessary. Instead, use terms that are inclusive and non-discriminatory.
Example (biased): "Each student should hand in his paper by Friday."
Example (neutral): "Each student should hand in their paper by Friday."
Avoid assumptions based on stereotypes: Be mindful of language that may unintentionally reinforce stereotypes or exclude groups.
Example (biased): "The elderly often struggle with technology."
Example (neutral): "Older adults may encounter challenges with technology."
Avoid unnecessary labels: Be mindful of how you describe people's characteristics. Labels such as "the disabled," "the poor," or "the mentally ill" can be dehumanizing or overly generalized.
Example (biased): "The disabled population faces many challenges."
Example (neutral): "People with disabilities face many challenges."
Significance: Avoiding biased language ensures your writing is respectful and inclusive, which is vital in academic writing, where fairness and objectivity are essential.
3. Maintaining Parallelism
Overview: Parallelism refers to the use of consistent grammatical structures when presenting ideas in a series. When items in a list or comparison are not parallel, the sentence can become awkward, and the reader may struggle to follow your meaning.
How to maintain parallelism:
Use consistent forms in lists and comparisons to ensure clarity and balance.
Example (non-parallel): "The research team will analyze the data, conducting experiments, and make conclusions."
Example (parallel): "The research team will analyze the data, conduct experiments, and draw conclusions."
Incomparative structures: When making comparisons, use the same grammatical structure for all the elements.
Example (non-parallel): "The new policy is more effective than the old one, and it saves money."
Example (parallel): "The new policy is more effective than the old one and more cost-efficient."
Why parallelism matters: Maintaining parallelism helps to make sentences easier to read and understand, allowing your arguments to flow logically. It also adds a sense of balance to your writing, making it more polished and professional.
4. Avoiding Ambiguity
Overview: Ambiguity occurs when a sentence or phrase can be interpreted in more than one way, leading to confusion or misinterpretation. Clear and precise language is crucial to avoid ambiguity in academic writing.
How to avoid ambiguity:
Be specific in your descriptions and avoid vague terms that could be interpreted differently by the reader.
Example (ambiguous): "The results were significant."
Example (clear): "The results showed a 20% increase in productivity, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05)."
Avoid unclear pronoun references: Make sure that the subject of your sentence is clear and that pronouns refer unambiguously to the correct noun.
Example (ambiguous): "John told Mike that he needed to submit the report."
Example (clear): "John told Mike that Mike needed to submit the report."
Why avoiding ambiguity matters: In academic writing, precision is key. Ambiguity can obscure the meaning of your arguments and make your writing less persuasive or confusing to your audience.
5. Precision in Word Choice
Overview: Using precise and appropriate vocabulary helps convey your ideas more effectively and ensures that your writing is clear and professional.
How to achieve precision:
Choose words that are specific and accurate. Avoid vague or overly general terms that could weaken your argument.
Example (imprecise): "The study found a significant impact."
Example (precise): "The study found a significant positive impact on students' test scores following the intervention."
Be cautious with using hedging language (e.g., "it seems," "might," "could"), as it can sometimes make your writing appear weak or unsure. Use hedging strategically, but don't overuse it.
6. Proper Punctuation and Grammar
Overview: Proper punctuation and grammar are essential in academic writing. They ensure that your ideas are presented clearly and that your writing is professional and credible.
How to use punctuation correctly:
Commas: Use commas to separate items in a list, after introductory phrases, and before conjunctions in compound sentences.
Colons and Semicolons: Use a colon to introduce a list or explanation, and a semicolon to separate two related independent clauses.
Apostrophes: Use apostrophes to indicate possession or contractions (although contractions should generally be avoided in formal academic writing).
Why punctuation and grammar matter: Incorrect punctuation and grammar can distract readers, create confusion, and undermine the professionalism of your work. Correct usage ensures that your ideas are clearly communicated and that your writing adheres to academic conventions.
Conclusion
By addressing these linguistic issues in academic writing—active vs. passive voice, avoiding biased language, maintaining parallelism, avoiding ambiguity, and using precise language—you will significantly improve the clarity, accuracy, and professionalism of your work. These strategies will help you communicate more effectively, ensuring that your ideas are presented in a logical, respectful, and clear manner.
Remember to always proofread your work with these linguistic principles in mind. By refining your language use, you can produce high-quality academic writing that is engaging, inclusive, and credible.
Happy writing!
In this video, you will study the four steps of writing an abstract. These four steps will guide you in constructing clear and concise sentences for your abstract. As we know, an abstract is a paragraph that summarizes your research work, and it also functions as an advertisement for your academic writing. It’s often the first thing readers see, so it must be written carefully and thoughtfully.
So, what will you do? Will you construct sentences randomly, or will you follow some organized steps?
Obviously, to ensure clarity, relevance, and conciseness, you should follow a structured process. In this video, we will break down these steps and give you examples to help you craft an effective abstract that showcases your research.
Step 1: State the Research Problem or Purpose
The first step in writing an abstract is to identify and state the problem or purpose of your research. This is critical because the abstract needs to immediately inform the reader of the specific issue or question your research addresses. Without this, the reader might not know what your study is about or why it is important.
How to do it:
Begin by introducing the context of your research.
Clearly identify the gap in knowledge or the specific problem your study aims to address.
Explain the research question or the main aim of your study.
Example:
Weak statement: "This paper explores some important concepts in psychology."
Stronger statement: "This study investigates the impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance, a topic that has not been extensively researched in recent years."
Why this matters: This step helps the reader understand what your study is aiming to solve or explore. It sets the stage for the rest of the abstract and shows the relevance of your work in the context of the broader field.
Step 2: Outline the Methodology
The second step is to briefly describe the methodology you used in your research. This gives the reader a sense of how you approached the problem and what kind of data or techniques were used to answer your research question.
How to do it:
Mention the type of research (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, experimental, observational).
Include key techniques or instruments you used (e.g., surveys, experiments, case studies).
Be brief—this section should summarize the methodology in a few sentences.
Example:
Weak statement: "We studied how sleep affects the brain."
Stronger statement: "A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 50 participants, using cognitive tests before and after a 24-hour period of sleep deprivation."
Why this matters: The methodology informs the reader how you collected and analyzed data. This step builds credibility, demonstrating that your research is based on a systematic and rigorous process.
Step 3: Summarize the Key Results
Next, summarize the main findings of your research. The results section of your abstract should be concise but specific, highlighting the most significant outcomes of your study.
How to do it:
Focus on quantitative results (e.g., numbers, percentages) if applicable.
If your research is qualitative, summarize the key themes or patterns that emerged.
Make sure to mention only the most important findings—this is not the place for all details.
Example:
Weak statement: "The results were important."
Stronger statement: "Participants who were sleep-deprived showed a 25% decrease in memory retention and a 30% increase in response time on cognitive tasks."
Why this matters: The results give the reader a clear picture of what you found in your research. This section will help them understand the significance of your study and whether it contributes valuable insights to the field.
Step 4: Conclude with the Implications or Significance
Finally, the last step in writing an abstract is to discuss the implications or significance of your findings. This shows why your research is important and how it contributes to the field or broader society.
How to do it:
Briefly mention the impact of your results on existing theories, practices, or future research.
You can also suggest potential applications of your findings or propose future directions for research.
Example:
Weak statement: "Sleep deprivation is an important issue."
Stronger statement: "These findings suggest that sleep deprivation significantly impairs cognitive function, highlighting the need for public health initiatives focused on sleep hygiene and cognitive well-being."
Why this matters: The conclusion of the abstract gives your research context and shows how it fits into the larger academic conversation. It provides the reader with a reason to care about your study and invites them to explore the full paper for more details.
Putting It All Together: Sample Abstract
Here’s how all four steps come together in a well-constructed abstract:
Research Problem/Purpose:
"This study investigates the impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance, a topic that has not been extensively researched in recent years."
Methodology:
"A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 50 participants, using cognitive tests before and after a 24-hour period of sleep deprivation."
Results:
"Participants who were sleep-deprived showed a 25% decrease in memory retention and a 30% increase in response time on cognitive tasks."
Implications/Significance:
"These findings suggest that sleep deprivation significantly impairs cognitive function, highlighting the need for public health initiatives focused on sleep hygiene and cognitive well-being."
Why Following These Steps Is Important
By following these four steps, you ensure that your abstract:
Clearly communicates the purpose and scope of your study.
Provides enough information about your research methods to show that your findings are based on solid evidence.
Highlights the significance of your results and their implications for the field.
Remains concise and focused, adhering to the typical length and format of an abstract.
Additional Tips for Writing an Effective Abstract
Be concise: Abstracts should typically be between 150 and 250 words, so make every word count.
Use clear and straightforward language: Avoid jargon or overly complex terminology. The goal is to make your abstract accessible to a wide audience.
Write the abstract last: Even though the abstract comes at the beginning of your paper, it’s best to write it after you’ve completed the rest of your work. This way, you can summarize the main points accurately.
Conclusion
In this video, we’ve outlined the four essential steps for writing an effective abstract:
State the research problem or purpose.
Outline the methodology.
Summarize the key results.
Conclude with the implications or significance of your findings.
By following these steps, you can construct a clear, concise, and compelling abstract that effectively summarizes your research and entices readers to explore your work further.
Happy writing!
In this video, you will study the "Dos" for writing an abstract. These Dos are actually guidelines for writing an abstract effectively, and we will study them one by one. Following these guidelines ensures that your abstract is clear, concise, and effective in summarizing your research.
No. 1: Sentences Are Unified, Coherent, and Concise
The first and most important Do in writing an abstract is to ensure that your sentences are unified, coherent, and concise. This means your abstract should present a clear, organized flow of ideas, with each sentence logically connected to the next. Avoid unnecessary details or off-topic information. Every sentence should contribute to the overall understanding of your research.
How to do it:
Use short, clear sentences that express one main idea at a time.
Ensure that each sentence builds on the previous one, creating a smooth transition from one idea to the next.
Keep your sentences concise—avoid using filler words or unnecessary details.
Example:
Let's look at this sample abstract:
Sentence 1: "This paper examines creolization in the Caribbean."
Sentence 2: "It looks into creolization from three points of view: linguistic, ethnic, and biological, and discusses language, identity, and gender of the Caribbean respectively."
Notice that Sentence 1 introduces the topic of the paper—creolization in the Caribbean. Sentence 2 connects to Sentence 1 by expanding on the specific aspects the paper will address: the linguistic, ethnic, and biological perspectives. The relationship between the two sentences is clear, and the reader is guided smoothly from the general topic to the specific focus of the study.
Why this matters:
Unified sentences ensure that each idea contributes to the overall message of the abstract. This prevents your writing from becoming fragmented or disjointed.
Coherence ensures that your reader can follow the flow of your research logically, without confusion.
Conciseness keeps your abstract brief and to the point, which is crucial for maintaining the reader’s attention in an academic context.
No. 2: Use of Active Voice
Another important Do is to use the active voice in your abstract whenever possible. Active voice makes your writing more direct, clearer, and easier to understand. It puts the focus on the subject performing the action, which is generally more engaging and less ambiguous than passive voice.
How to do it:
Ensure the subject of the sentence is doing the action.
Avoid overusing passive constructions where the subject is acted upon, unless necessary for the context.
Example:
Active voice: "This paper analyzes the impact of creolization on language and culture."
Passive voice: "The impact of creolization on language and culture is analyzed in this paper."
Why this matters: Active voice makes the abstract more engaging and dynamic. It helps to make your argument stronger and more straightforward, which is crucial when summarizing research in a limited word count.
No. 3: Use Specific and Precise Language
A key Do when writing an abstract is to use specific and precise language. Avoid vague terms and generalizations that could confuse your reader. Specificity makes your research stand out and communicates your work more effectively.
How to do it:
Use clear, exact terms that describe your research, methodology, and results.
Avoid terms like "things," "stuff," or "important," which are too broad.
Instead, focus on technical terms or concrete results that clearly define your study.
Example:
Vague: "This paper examines the social changes in the Caribbean."
Specific: "This paper examines the sociolinguistic impact of creolization on Caribbean communities, focusing on language use, identity formation, and gender roles."
Why this matters: Specific language adds precision to your abstract, making it easier for the reader to understand exactly what your research covers. It also demonstrates your expertise and attention to detail.
No. 4: Include the Most Important Results and Findings
Your abstract should clearly summarize the most important results and findings of your research. Avoid including unnecessary details or secondary findings. Instead, highlight the key discoveries that answer your research question or address the research problem you identified.
How to do it:
Focus on major results that directly relate to your research question.
If your results are quantitative, provide numerical data or percentages.
If your results are qualitative, briefly summarize key themes or patterns that emerged.
Example:
Weak example: "The research provides some insight into creolization."
Strong example: "The study found that creolization led to a 40% increase in language hybridity, influencing both identity construction and gender perceptions within Caribbean communities."
Why this matters: By focusing on the most important results, you ensure that your abstract is informative and highlights the value of your research. It shows the reader why your study matters without overwhelming them with details.
No. 5: Keep it Objective and Neutral
When writing an abstract, it is important to maintain an objective and neutral tone. This means avoiding personal opinions, overly emotional language, or unsupported claims. Your abstract should be a factual summary of your research, not a place for subjective interpretation.
How to do it:
Use neutral language when describing your findings and avoid using overly assertive or opinionated phrases.
Focus on what your research shows, not what you "believe" or "feel."
Example:
Subjective: "I believe that creolization has drastically changed the Caribbean's language and culture."
Objective: "The study shows that creolization has significantly influenced language hybridity and cultural identity in the Caribbean."
Why this matters: An objective tone enhances the credibility of your research. Academic writing is about presenting facts and evidence, not personal opinions. Maintaining neutrality ensures that your abstract is professional and trustworthy.
No. 6: Be Consistent with Tense
Another Do when writing an abstract is to maintain consistent tense throughout the abstract. Typically, the present tense is used to describe the purpose of the research, while the past tense is used to describe the methodology and results.
How to do it:
Use present tense for general statements about the paper’s objectives, implications, and conclusions.
Use past tense to describe the research process and findings, as these are completed actions.
Example:
Correct: "This paper examines the creolization of the Caribbean (present tense). A survey was conducted to collect data (past tense). The results indicated a strong correlation between language hybridity and identity (past tense)."
Why this matters: Consistent use of tense keeps your abstract logically structured and easy to follow. It avoids confusion and ensures that the reader can clearly differentiate between the purpose of the research and the actions you’ve already taken.
Conclusion
In this video, we’ve covered several Dos for writing an abstract. These guidelines will help ensure that your abstract is:
Unified, coherent, and concise — with short, clear sentences that logically connect to each other.
Written in the active voice — to make your abstract more direct and engaging.
Specific and precise — to communicate your research effectively without ambiguity.
Focused on important results — highlighting the key findings of your study.
Objective and neutral — maintaining a professional tone throughout.
Consistent with tense — to avoid confusion and maintain clarity.
By following these guidelines, you can write an abstract that effectively summarizes your research and grabs the attention of your audience. Happy writing!
In this video, you will study "how to form a hypothesis." A hypothesis is a formal statement or explanation about the research that is to be tested. It is a crucial component of the research process as it provides a clear focus for your study and directs your methodology.
What is a Hypothesis?
A hypothesis is an educated guess or a proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation. It is a testable statement that predicts the relationship between variables. Essentially, when you undertake research, you start with a research question, which is often grounded in prior knowledge or assumptions. Based on that research question, you form a hypothesis, which will be tested through your research.
Key Features of a Hypothesis:
It is a statement, not a question.
It is testable and falsifiable—meaning it can be supported or disproven based on the evidence you collect.
It is based on a theoretical framework or existing research, meaning it isn’t just a guess but an informed prediction.
Step 1: Starting with a Research Question
Before you can form a hypothesis, you must first identify a research question. This question arises from a gap in knowledge or a problem that you want to explore. Your research question provides direction and guides your research process.
How to do it:
Start with a broad question that addresses a problem in your field of study.
Narrow the question down to focus on a specific issue that is feasible to study within the constraints of your project.
Example:
Broad Question: "How does social media impact teenagers' mental health?"
Narrowed Question: "Does the use of Instagram lead to increased feelings of loneliness in teenagers?"
Why this matters: The research question provides the foundation for your hypothesis. It defines what you're trying to discover or explain.
Step 2: Background Assumption
Next, a background assumption or theoretical framework is formed based on existing research, observations, or previous studies in the field. This step involves understanding the existing literature and assumptions that inform your research question. These background assumptions will guide you in forming your hypothesis.
How to do it:
Review the existing literature related to your research question.
Consider prior studies, findings, and theories that might help inform your prediction.
Example:
If your research question is about social media and loneliness, existing studies may show that teenagers who spend more time on social media platforms, like Instagram, often report higher levels of loneliness.
Background assumption: "Prior research suggests that increased social media use is linked to negative mental health outcomes, including feelings of loneliness."
Why this matters: The background assumption or theoretical framework ensures that your hypothesis is grounded in existing knowledge. It connects your study to the broader academic conversation and helps shape your hypothesis into a tractable assumption.
Step 3: Formulating the Hypothesis
With your research question and background assumptions in place, it’s time to formulate your hypothesis. A hypothesis typically consists of two parts: the independent variable (the factor you will change or manipulate) and the dependent variable (the factor you will measure or observe).
How to do it:
Identify your variables: what are you changing and what are you measuring?
Create a predictive statement that suggests a relationship between the variables.
Make sure your hypothesis is testable—meaning it can be supported or disproven by your research data.
Types of Hypotheses:
Null Hypothesis (H0): This hypothesis suggests that there is no relationship between the variables, and any observed effect is due to chance.
Example: "Instagram use has no effect on the loneliness levels of teenagers."
Alternative Hypothesis (H1): This hypothesis suggests that there is a relationship between the variables.
Example: "Increased Instagram use leads to higher levels of loneliness in teenagers."
Example:
Research Question: "Does the use of Instagram lead to increased feelings of loneliness in teenagers?"
Background Assumption: "Prior research indicates a link between social media use and negative mental health outcomes like loneliness."
Hypothesis: "Teenagers who use Instagram for more than three hours a day report higher levels of loneliness compared to those who use it for less than one hour per day."
Why this matters: The hypothesis helps direct the research methodology and provides a clear path for testing. A well-formed hypothesis makes it easier to design experiments, collect data, and analyze results.
Step 4: Making the Hypothesis Testable
A good hypothesis should be testable and falsifiable. This means that it must be possible to test whether the hypothesis is true or false through experimentation or observation. Testability is one of the most important aspects of a hypothesis because it ensures that the research can be empirically validated or refuted.
How to do it:
Ensure that the hypothesis can be measured: Can you observe and record the relevant data?
Use clear, operational definitions for each variable involved in the hypothesis.
Example:
Testable Hypothesis: "Teenagers who use Instagram for more than three hours a day report higher levels of loneliness compared to those who use it for less than one hour per day."
In this case, you can measure Instagram usage and loneliness levels through surveys or questionnaires.
Non-testable Hypothesis: "Instagram makes teenagers feel sad."
This hypothesis is vague and does not define how to measure "sadness," making it difficult to test.
Why this matters: A testable hypothesis ensures that your research is grounded in data and can contribute valuable evidence to the field.
Step 5: Refining Your Hypothesis
Once you have formulated your hypothesis, it’s important to refine it by reviewing and revising it for clarity and precision. Make sure your hypothesis is specific, testable, and logically derived from your research question and background assumptions.
How to do it:
Review your hypothesis for clarity: Is it clear and understandable?
Make sure it is specific: Does it predict a specific relationship between the variables?
Ensure that it is researchable: Can you design an experiment to test it?
Example:
Vague Hypothesis: "Social media impacts teenagers."
Refined Hypothesis: "Teenagers who spend more than three hours per day on Instagram will report higher levels of loneliness compared to those who spend less time."
Why this matters: Refining the hypothesis makes your research more focused and your predictions clearer. It also helps improve the precision of your data collection and analysis.
Conclusion
In this video, you learned how to form a hypothesis, a crucial part of the research process. To summarize:
Start with a research question based on a problem or gap in knowledge.
Use background assumptions or existing theories to guide your hypothesis.
Formulate a clear, testable hypothesis that predicts the relationship between your variables.
Make sure your hypothesis is testable and falsifiable, and define your variables in a way that allows you to measure them.
Finally, refine your hypothesis to ensure that it is specific, clear, and researchable.
By following these steps, you can formulate a strong and testable hypothesis that will guide your research and help you answer your research question effectively.
Happy researching!
In this video, you will study “how to make your research writing argumentative.” Argumentative writing applies critical thinking skills to writing, and when done correctly, it strengthens your research and ensures your audience takes your ideas seriously.
What is Argumentative Writing?
Argumentative writing is about presenting a clear, reasoned argument supported by evidence, while addressing potential counterarguments. It’s not just about stating opinions, but rather about convincing the reader with well-supported points, logical reasoning, and factual evidence.
What makes writing argumentative?
Sound reasoning: Your arguments must be based on logic, facts, and sound reasoning.
Evidence: Strong arguments are supported with data, studies, and facts.
Clear structure: Each paragraph should clearly support the overall argument.
Critical engagement: You must engage with alternative viewpoints and present counterarguments.
So, what do you need to do to make your research writing argumentative? You just need to ensure that your thinking is sound and that your writing clearly presents logical, well-supported points.
First Step: Recognize and Remove Errors in Reasoning
One of the first ways to improve the argumentative quality of your writing is to recognize and remove errors in reasoning. Errors in reasoning can weaken your argument and make it less persuasive. Common logical fallacies include errors that mislead the reader or undermine your credibility.
Here are some common errors in reasoning that you should avoid:
1. Hasty Generalization
Hasty generalization occurs when you make a broad claim based on a limited amount of evidence. This fallacy can lead to conclusions that are not supported by enough data or that don’t account for exceptions or variability.
How to avoid it: Always ensure that your conclusions are based on a wide range of evidence and are not based on isolated examples.
Example of Hasty Generalization:
Weak Argument: "I spoke with three students who said they didn’t enjoy using online learning platforms. Therefore, online learning is ineffective."
Stronger Argument: "Surveys of hundreds of students across multiple universities reveal mixed opinions on online learning platforms, indicating that while some students struggle with them, others find them highly beneficial."
Why this matters: Hasty generalization undermines your argument by drawing broad conclusions from insufficient or unrepresentative evidence.
2. False Cause (Causality Fallacy)
This error happens when you mistakenly assume that because two events occur together, one must have caused the other. This is also called a false cause fallacy.
How to avoid it: Be sure to distinguish between correlation and causation—just because two things happen together doesn’t mean one causes the other.
Example of False Cause:
Weak Argument: "The number of students who wear glasses has increased in the last decade, and so has the number of students diagnosed with learning disabilities. Therefore, wearing glasses causes learning disabilities."
Stronger Argument: "Although the number of students diagnosed with learning disabilities and those wearing glasses has increased over the last decade, this correlation does not imply that wearing glasses causes learning disabilities. Further research is needed to explore other contributing factors, such as increased awareness of learning disabilities."
Why this matters: Misleading cause-and-effect claims can weaken your argument and lead to incorrect conclusions that your audience will not trust.
3. Appeal to Emotion (Pathos)
An appeal to emotion is when you manipulate the reader's emotions to win an argument, instead of using reason or evidence. This is often seen as a fallacy because it bypasses logical analysis.
How to avoid it: While it’s okay to use emotional appeal in certain cases (such as discussing human rights issues), your argument should still be supported by facts and logical reasoning.
Example of Appeal to Emotion:
Weak Argument: "Imagine how terrible it would be if we don’t do something about climate change. Think of the children suffering now. We must act immediately!"
Stronger Argument: "The current rate of global warming is leading to significant ecological disruption, as evidenced by rising sea levels and extreme weather patterns. Scientific studies predict that these trends will continue if immediate action is not taken."
Why this matters: While emotional appeal can motivate people to care about an issue, your argument should ultimately stand on facts and evidence. Overreliance on emotion weakens the credibility of your argument.
4. Straw Man Fallacy
The straw man fallacy occurs when you misrepresent someone else’s argument in order to make it easier to attack. This happens when you oversimplify or distort another person’s argument to knock it down more easily.
How to avoid it: When presenting counterarguments, make sure to represent the opposing viewpoint accurately and engage with it fairly, rather than distorting it to make it seem weaker.
Example of Straw Man:
Weak Argument: "Some people argue that we should not regulate social media companies because of free speech concerns. But clearly, they are just against any kind of regulation, even if it means protecting users from harmful content."
Stronger Argument: "Some critics argue that regulating social media companies could violate free speech rights. While this concern is important, regulation could be structured in a way that balances the need for free expression with protections against harmful content."
Why this matters: Misrepresenting an argument to make it easier to attack undermines your credibility and prevents meaningful dialogue. Engaging with opposing viewpoints in a fair and accurate way strengthens your argument.
5. Ad Hominem Attacks
An ad hominem attack occurs when you attack the character or motives of the person making an argument, rather than addressing the substance of the argument itself. This can derail the focus of the debate and is seen as an unfair tactic.
How to avoid it: Always focus on addressing the merits of the argument, not the person making it. Engage with the ideas, not the individual.
Example of Ad Hominem:
Weak Argument: "Dr. Smith’s argument on environmental policy is invalid because she’s not an economist, she’s a political scientist."
Stronger Argument: "While Dr. Smith's background is in political science, her argument about environmental policy should be evaluated based on the evidence she presents, including the studies cited in her research."
Why this matters: Ad hominem attacks undermine the academic integrity of your work. Focusing on the content of the argument, not the person, makes your writing more professional and credible.
6. Over-Simplification (False Dichotomy)
The false dichotomy fallacy occurs when you present two opposing options as the only possibilities, when in fact there might be multiple possibilities or solutions.
How to avoid it: Always acknowledge multiple perspectives or possible solutions to a problem, and avoid presenting an issue as if there are only two extremes.
Example of Over-Simplification:
Weak Argument: "We either ban all plastic now, or our planet will be doomed."
Stronger Argument: "While banning plastic could help reduce environmental damage, other strategies, such as increasing recycling efforts and developing biodegradable alternatives, could also be effective. A multifaceted approach may be necessary."
Why this matters: Oversimplification limits the depth and quality of your argument. Presenting nuanced solutions or acknowledging multiple perspectives strengthens the sophistication of your writing.
Conclusion
In this video, we’ve discussed several key errors in reasoning that can undermine the quality of your argumentative research writing. To make your writing truly argumentative, you must:
Identify and remove logical fallacies like hasty generalization, false causality, emotional appeal, straw man attacks, ad hominem attacks, and false dichotomies.
Ensure your thinking is sound by grounding your argument in evidence, considering alternative viewpoints, and maintaining a logical flow.
By avoiding these errors and focusing on strong reasoning and factual evidence, you can build a more persuasive, well-supported argument that will convince your readers and elevate the quality of your academic writing.
Happy writing!
In this video, you will study “how to avoid plagiarism and paraphrase appropriately.” We will see what is the difference between paraphrased and summarized information, how to recognize plagiarism, and how to prepare a summary of a passage. These skills are crucial for maintaining academic integrity and ensuring that your work is both original and properly credited.
What is Plagiarism?
Plagiarism occurs when you use someone else’s work, ideas, or words without proper attribution or citation. It’s a serious offense in academic writing because it involves presenting someone else’s intellectual property as your own.
Plagiarism can take many forms:
Direct copying: Copying and pasting text from a source without quotation marks or citation.
Paraphrasing without citation: Rewriting someone else’s ideas or information in your own words but failing to credit the original author.
Self-plagiarism: Reusing your own previously published work without acknowledging that it was written before.
Example of plagiarism (direct copying):
Original text: "The process of photosynthesis is essential for plant growth and involves the conversion of light energy into chemical energy."
Plagiarized text: "Photosynthesis is essential for plant growth, and it converts light energy into chemical energy."
This is plagiarism because the wording and idea are taken directly from the original source, without citation.
Difference Between Paraphrasing and Summarizing
It’s important to understand the difference between paraphrasing and summarizing, as they both serve different purposes and require different techniques.
Paraphrasing: When you paraphrase, you rewrite the original passage in your own words, maintaining the full meaning and details of the original text. The goal is to express the same ideas but with different language and structure. Importantly, you must cite the source even when paraphrasing because you are still using someone else’s ideas.
Example:
Original text: "The process of photosynthesis is essential for plant growth and involves the conversion of light energy into chemical energy." Paraphrased text: "Photosynthesis plays a crucial role in the development of plants by transforming light into energy that the plant can use to grow."
Notice how the idea is the same, but the words and structure are changed.
Summarizing: Summarizing involves reducing the original text to its key points or main ideas. When summarizing, you shorten the original content significantly, providing only the essential information. A summary is typically much shorter than the original passage. Like paraphrasing, a summary must also be cited because it’s based on someone else’s work.
Example:
Original text: "The process of photosynthesis is essential for plant growth and involves the conversion of light energy into chemical energy. This process allows plants to produce the food they need to survive and thrive, which is crucial for the broader ecosystem as plants serve as the primary producers of food in many environments."
Summary: "Photosynthesis is vital for plant growth and the production of food, which supports ecosystems."
Here, we’ve reduced the information to the key ideas: photosynthesis’ importance to plant growth and its role in ecosystems.
How to Paraphrase Appropriately
Now that we’ve discussed the difference between paraphrasing and summarizing, let’s focus on how to paraphrase appropriately and avoid plagiarism.
When you paraphrase, it’s crucial to:
Rewrite the passage in your own words: This means changing both the vocabulary and sentence structure. Simply swapping a few words or rearranging the sentence is not enough.
Keep the original meaning: Your paraphrase should accurately reflect the original idea or information.
Be concise, but keep important details: Focus on the important points, but don’t lose essential information in the process of simplifying.
Credit the original source: Even though you’ve reworded the passage, you still need to acknowledge the original author.
Steps to Paraphrase Effectively
Read the original text carefully: Understand what the author is saying. Make sure you grasp the meaning fully before attempting to paraphrase.
Highlight the key points: Identify the most important ideas or facts that you need to include in your paraphrase.
Write the paraphrase in your own words: Rewrite the passage without looking at the original text. This will ensure that you don’t copy phrases directly and that your paraphrase is truly in your own style.
Compare with the original text: After writing the paraphrase, compare it with the original to make sure you haven’t copied too much or missed any critical points. The meaning should remain the same, but the wording and structure should be different.
Cite the source: Even though you’ve rewritten the information, you must cite the original source. This is crucial for academic honesty.
Example of paraphrasing appropriately:
Original passage:
"Social media has dramatically transformed the way people communicate, making it possible for individuals to connect with others from around the world instantly. This has had profound impacts on both personal relationships and business practices."
Paraphrase:
"Platforms like Facebook and Twitter have revolutionized communication by enabling immediate global connections, which has significantly affected personal interactions and how businesses operate."
Why this is appropriate: The paraphrase conveys the same main ideas as the original, but the wording and sentence structure are different. Plus, if this is part of your research, you would still need to cite the source of the original passage.
How to Recognize Plagiarism
It’s important to recognize when plagiarism might be happening so you can avoid it. Some signs of plagiarism include:
Copying and pasting directly from a source without quotation marks or citation.
Paraphrasing too closely to the original source without changing enough of the sentence structure or vocabulary.
Failing to cite sources for ideas, facts, or data that are not your own.
Example of plagiarism through closely paraphrasing:
Original: "The climate change crisis is causing widespread effects on ecosystems and communities globally, and urgent action is needed to mitigate its impacts."
Plagiarized (close paraphrasing): "The global climate change crisis is causing widespread effects on communities and ecosystems, and immediate steps need to be taken to reduce its consequences."
While the wording is slightly changed, the structure and ideas remain too similar to the original, making it a form of plagiarism. A proper paraphrase would involve significantly altering the structure and wording.
How to Prepare a Summary of a Passage
Summarizing involves distilling a longer passage down to its essential points. Here’s how to prepare a summary:
Read the entire passage: Fully understand the content before trying to summarize it.
Identify the key points: Look for the main argument, findings, or ideas that the author is conveying. Ignore minor details, examples, or excessive elaboration.
Condense the information: Use your own words to capture the essence of the passage. Focus only on the most critical aspects.
Be concise: A summary is usually much shorter than the original text, so focus only on the most important ideas and leave out unnecessary information.
Cite the source: Even when you summarize, you must give credit to the original author.
Example of summarizing a passage:
Original passage:
"While some researchers argue that technology in classrooms can enhance the learning experience by providing students with access to a wealth of information, others caution that over-reliance on digital tools might reduce face-to-face interactions and hinder the development of social skills."
Summary:
"Some researchers believe technology improves learning by providing access to information, while others warn that it may reduce social interaction and harm social skills."
Why this is a good summary: The summary condenses the main points into a much shorter version, maintaining the central ideas while leaving out unnecessary details and examples.
Conclusion
In this video, you’ve learned how to avoid plagiarism and paraphrase appropriately, which is essential for producing high-quality academic work. To recap:
Understand the difference between paraphrasing and summarizing: Paraphrasing involves rewriting detailed information in your own words, while summarizing involves condensing the main ideas.
Recognize plagiarism: Know what constitutes plagiarism, such as direct copying, overly close paraphrasing, or failing to cite sources.
Paraphrase effectively: Change both the structure and wording of the original passage while maintaining its meaning, and always cite your sources.
Prepare a summary: Focus on the key points, condense the information, and ensure that you’re providing a concise version of the original text.
By mastering these techniques, you’ll be able to maintain academic integrity and present your research in a clear, professional manner.
Happy writing!
In this video, you will learn about the checklist you should cross-check before submitting your academic writing for publication. It's essential to take a systematic approach to ensure your work is well-prepared, polished, and meets the standards for publication.
Step 1: Did I Maintain the Four Cs of Academic Writing? Did I Address Language Issues in My Writing?
Before submitting your work, always revisit the Four Cs of Academic Writing. These principles ensure that your writing is effective and clear.
Clear: Ensure that your ideas are easily understood. Avoid complex language or jargon that could confuse the reader. Your writing should be precise and direct.
Example of Clear Writing:
Before: "The results have an overarching effect on the implementation of the policy, potentially leading to a reformation of the operational landscape."
After: "The results can significantly influence how the policy is applied and may lead to changes in the operations."
Concise: Eliminate unnecessary words. Academic writing should get to the point without being wordy.
Example of Concise Writing:
Before: "It is widely known that there are numerous various kinds of challenges that can be found in the field of research studies."
After: "Research studies face numerous challenges."
Coherent: Ensure the flow of ideas is logical. Each section should connect smoothly to the next, and paragraphs should follow one another in a way that makes sense. Use appropriate linking phrases and transitions.
Example of Coherent Writing:
Before: "This paper investigates the history of ancient texts. The next section will discuss the technological advancements of the 21st century."
After: "This paper investigates the history of ancient texts, laying the foundation for understanding how modern technological advancements, discussed in the next section, shape our interpretation of these texts."
Credible: Support your claims with evidence. Refer to authoritative sources and provide a robust bibliography to show the credibility of your research.
Example of Credible Writing:
"According to Smith (2022), who conducted a study on climate change, we are experiencing unprecedented levels of carbon emissions. This data supports the growing concern about global warming."
Next, check for language issues:
Are you using the appropriate tense? (For example, the past tense for completed studies and present tense for general facts or ongoing discussions).
Is your grammar accurate? Make sure your sentences are well-structured and free from mistakes.
Step 2: Did I Write My Abstract Appropriately? Did I Follow the Steps for Writing an Abstract?
The abstract is often the first part of your paper that readers will see, and it should succinctly summarize your research. If done correctly, it will grab the reader's attention and provide a concise overview of your study.
Checklist for Abstract Writing:
Purpose of the study: Start by clearly stating the research question or objective.
Example: "This study examines the impact of social media on youth mental health."
Methods: Briefly mention how you conducted your research.
Example: "A survey was conducted with 500 high school students to gather data on their social media usage and mental health."
Results: Summarize the key findings of your research.
Example: "The results suggest a strong correlation between excessive social media use and increased levels of anxiety among teens."
Conclusions: Conclude with the implications of your findings and any recommendations.
Example: "These findings highlight the need for more awareness and interventions to address social media’s impact on mental health."
By following these steps, your abstract will not only provide a snapshot of your research but also entice the reader to continue reading your full paper.
Step 3: Did I Make an Argument in My Research? Did I Paraphrase Appropriately and Avoid Plagiarism?
One of the core aspects of academic writing is presenting a well-supported argument. Ensure that your research builds a clear argument, supported by evidence, and engages critically with existing literature.
Building an Argument: Your argument should have a clear thesis statement, supported by logical reasoning, empirical data, and references to existing research.
Example of a Clear Argument: "While traditional educational systems focus on memorization, a shift towards experiential learning promotes critical thinking and better prepares students for the future workforce."
Paraphrasing and Avoiding Plagiarism: It's crucial that you paraphrase appropriately and always give credit to the original authors. If you are using someone else's ideas, be sure to rewrite them in your own words and cite the source.
Example of Proper Paraphrasing:
Original: "Climate change is exacerbated by the growing emission of greenhouse gases from industrial activities." Paraphrase: "Industrial activities contribute significantly to climate change by increasing the release of greenhouse gases."
Remember, avoiding plagiarism means not only paraphrasing well but also properly citing all your sources. Even if you summarize or paraphrase, you must always provide a citation. Failing to do so is considered plagiarism.
Step 4: Did I Shortlist and Select the Journal Carefully?
Selecting the right journal for your work is crucial for the success of your publication. Not all journals are suitable for all types of research. Carefully choosing the journal that best aligns with the topic and scope of your paper can increase your chances of acceptance.
Checklist for Selecting a Journal:
Scope and Audience: Ensure the journal’s scope aligns with the subject of your research. For instance, if your paper deals with environmental policy, submitting it to a specialized environmental journal is a better choice than a general scientific journal.
Example: If your research is about the impact of AI in education, choose a journal focusing on technology in education, not a journal dedicated to medical sciences.
Reputation: Research the journal’s impact factor and reputation in your field. High-impact journals often have stricter acceptance criteria, but they can significantly boost the visibility of your work.
Example: Journals like "Nature" or "Science" are prestigious, but there are also many reputable specialized journals in various fields.
Review Process: Check if the journal offers peer review. Peer-reviewed journals are considered more credible because experts in the field evaluate the quality and validity of the research before it is published.
Submission Guidelines: Every journal has specific submission guidelines, including formatting, word count limits, referencing style, and more. Make sure to carefully follow these instructions to avoid desk rejection.
Open Access or Subscription-Based: Decide whether you want to publish in an open-access journal (where anyone can access your work for free) or a subscription-based one. Open access journals generally have wider readership but may involve publication fees.
By carefully selecting the right journal, you maximize the impact and reach of your research.
Conclusion
So, when you're ready to submit your academic writing, make sure to cross-check these four key steps in your checklist:
Did I maintain the Four Cs of Academic Writing? Did I address language issues and make sure my writing is clear, concise, coherent, and credible?
Did I write my abstract appropriately? Did I follow the steps for writing a clear and engaging abstract?
Did I make a solid argument? Did I paraphrase appropriately and avoid plagiarism, ensuring that my research is well-supported and properly cited?
Did I carefully select the journal? Did I shortlist the right journal that aligns with the subject and scope of my paper?
By ensuring that all of these points are covered, you’ll increase your chances of publishing high-quality, impactful research.
Good luck with your academic writing journey!
Fluency is an interesting word. So, you are fluent a speaker. Good! But what about writing- okay, you write well too. Fine! What about academic writing. What! You are not sure about it. Don’t worry! I will teach you the tricks of the trade. By the end of this course, you will learn how to become a successful academic writer. I will teach you:
· How to write an abstract?
You will study dos for writing an abstract.
· Linguistic issues in academic writing, and how to take care of them?
· How to paraphrase and avoid plagiarism?
We will see what is the difference between paraphrased and summarized information; how to recognize plagiarism; and how to prepare a summary of a passage.
· How to form a hypothesis and form research questions?
A hypothesis is a formal statement or explanation about the research that is to be tested.
· How to make your research writing argumentative?
If you remove errors in reasoning and remove improper appeals to emotion, then you can make your research writing argumentative.
· How to publish in an academic scholarly journal?
When you think that your academic writing is ready for publication, you need to cross-check a checklist:
Step 1: Did I maintain four Cs of Academic Writing? Did I take care of language issues in my writing?
Step 2: Did I write my abstract appropriately? Did I follow the steps of writing an abstract?
Step 3: Did I make an argument in my research? Did I paraphrase appropriately and avoid plagiarism?
Step 4: Did I shortlist and select the journal carefully?